The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thermodynamic Analysis of Resources Used in Manufacturing Processes
Abstract
In this study we use a thermodynamic framework to characterize the material and energy resources used in manufacturing processes. The analysis and data span a wide range of processes from "conventional" processes such as machining, casting, and injection molding, to the so-called "advanced machining" processes such as electrical discharge machining and abrasive waterjet machining, and to the vapor-phase processes used in semiconductor and nanomaterials fabrication. In all, 20 processes are analyzed. The results show that the intensity of materials and energy used per unit of mass of material processed (measured either as specific energy or exergy) has increased by at least 6 orders of magnitude over the past several decades. The increase of material/energy intensity use has been primarily a consequence of the introduction of new manufacturing processes, rather than changes in traditional technologies. This phenomenon has been driven by the desire for precise small-scale devices and product features and enabled by stable and declining material and energy prices over this period. We illustrate the relevance of thermodynamics (including exergy analysis) for all processes in spite of the fact that long-lasting focus in manufacturing has been on product quality--not necessarily energy/material conversion efficiency. We promote the use of thermodynamics tools for analysis of manufacturing processes within the context of rapidly increasing relevance of sustainable human enterprises. We confirm that exergy analysis can be used to identify where resources are lost in these processes, which is the first step in proposing and/or redesigning new more efficient processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Green” electronics: biodegradable and biocompatible materials and devices for sustainable future
Irimia-Vladu, M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60235d · Cited by 1,044
Material efficiency: A white paper
Allwood, J. M., Ashby, M. F., Gutowski, T. G., & Worrell, E. (2011) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 · Cited by 927
Self-citationThe cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push
Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., & Hague, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015 · Cited by 658
Energy consumption model and energy efficiency of machine tools: a comprehensive literature review
Zhou, L., Li, J., Li, F., Meng, Q., Li, J., & Xu, X. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.093 · Cited by 498
Sustainability of additive manufacturing: An overview on its energy demand and environmental impact
Peng, T., Kellens, K., Tang, R., Chen, C., & Chen, G. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022 · Cited by 426
Remanufacturing and Energy Savings
Gutowski, T. G., Sahni, S., Boustani, A., & Graves, S. C. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es102598b · Cited by 260
Self-citationPeng, S., Li, T., Wang, X., Dong, M., Liu, Z., Shi, J., & Zhang, H. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12628 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutowski, T. G., Branham, M. S., Dahmus, J. B., Jones, A. J., Thiriez, A., & Sekulic, D. P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-01-29
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1584-1590
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2135513594
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.