Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental p Ka Determination for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and the Potential Impact of p Ka Concentration Dependence on Laboratory-Measured Partitioning Phenomena and Environmental Modeling

Burns, Darcy C., Ellis, David A., Li, Hongxia, McMurdo, Colin J., Webster, Eva·2008·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

An accurately measured equilibrium acid dissociation constant (pKa) is essential for understanding and predicting the fate of perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) in the environment. The aqueous pKa of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has been determined potentiometrically using a standard water-methanol mixed solvent approach and was found to be 3.8 +/- 0.1. The acidity of PFOA is thus considerably weaker than its shorter-chain PFCA homologues. This was attributed to differences in molecular and electronic structure, coupled with solvation effects. The pKa of PFOA was suppressed to approximately 2.3 at higher concentrations because of the aggregation of perfluorooctanoate (PFO). Often, PFCA partion coefficients are determined at concentrations above those found in the environment. Thus, it was suggested that a pKa correction factor, which accounts for this concentration-dependent shift in acid/base equilibrium, should be applied to PFCA partition efficients before they are implemented in environmental fate models. A pKa of 3.8 +/- 0.1 suggests that a considerable concentration of the PFCA exists as the neutral species in the aqueous environment for example, in typical Ontario rainwater, it is approximately 17%. Transport, fate, and partitioning models have often ignored the presence this species completely. The environmental dissemination of PFCAs could, in part, be explained by considering the role of the neutral species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es802047v

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Burns, D. C., Ellis, D. A., Li, H., McMurdo, C. J., & Webster, E.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2008-11-07
Volume
42
Issue
24
Pages
9283-9288
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2015338499
Cited by
270
References
3
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental p Ka Determination for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and the Potential Impact of p Ka Concentration Dependence on Laboratory-Measured Partitioning Phenomena and Environmental Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es802047v
The paper
Burns, D. C., Ellis, D. A., Li, H., McMurdo, C. J., & Webster, E. (2008). Experimental p Ka Determination for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and the Potential Impact of p Ka Concentration Dependence on Laboratory-Measured Partitioning Phenomena and Environmental Modeling. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802047v

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.