The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Carbon Mesh Anodes and the Effect of Different Pretreatment Methods on Power Production in Microbial Fuel Cells
Abstract
Flat electrodes are useful in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) as close electrode spacing improves power generation. Carbon cloth and carbon paper materials typically used in hydrogen fuel cells, however, are prohibitively expensive for use in MFCs. An inexpensive carbon mesh material was examined here as a substantially less expensive alternative to these materials for the anode in an MFC. Pretreatment of the carbon mesh was needed to ensure adequate MFC performance. Heating the carbon mesh in a muffle furnace (450 degrees C for 30 min) resulted in a maximum power density of 922 mW/m2 (46 W/m3) with this heat-treated anode, which was 3% more power than that produced using a mesh anode cleaned with acetone (893 mW/ m2; 45 W/m3). This power density with heating was only 7% less than that achieved with carbon cloth treated by a high temperature ammonia gas process (988 mW/m2; 49 W/m3). When the carbon mesh was treated by the ammonia gas process, power increased to 1015 mW/m2(51 W/m3). Analysis of the cleaned or heated surfaces showed these processes decreased atomic O/C ratio, indicating removal of contaminants that interfered with charge transfer. Ammonia gas treatment also increased the atomic N/C ratio, suggesting that this process produced nitrogen related functional groups that facilitated electron transfer. These results show that low cost heat-treated carbon mesh materials can be used as the anode in an MFC, providing good performance and even exceeding performance of carbon cloth anodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments
Bond, D. R., Holmes, D. E., Tender, L. M., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066771 · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Carbon‐Based Microbial‐Fuel‐Cell Electrodes: From Conductive Supports to Active Catalysts
Li, S., Cheng, C., & Thomas, A. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602547 · Cited by 423
Elshobary, M. E., Zabed, H. M., Yun, J., Zhang, G., & Qi, X. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.251 · Cited by 158
Ahmed, S., Rozaik, E., & Abdelhalim, H. (2015) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-015-2567-3 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Cheng, S., Feng, Y., Merrill, M. D., Saito, T., & Logan, B. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-07-17
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6870-6874
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2002342453
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.