The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Greenhouse Gas Emission Footprints and Energy Use Benchmarks for Eight U.S. Cities
Open accessAbstract
A hybrid life cycle-based trans-boundary greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions footprint is elucidated at the city-scale and evaluated for 8 US cities. The method incorporates end-uses of energy within city boundaries, plus cross-boundary demand for airline/freight transport and embodied energy of four key urban materials [food, water, energy (fuels), and shelter (cement)], essential for life in all cities. These cross-boundary activities contributed 47% on average more than the in-boundary GHG contributions traditionally reported for cities, indicating significant truncation at city boundaries of GHG emissions associated with urban activities. Incorporating cross-boundary contributions created convergence in per capita GHG emissions from the city-scale (average 23.7 mt-CO(2)e/capita) to the national-scale (24.5 mt-CO(2)e/capita), suggesting that six key cross-boundary activities may suffice to yield a holistic GHG emission footprint for cities, with important policy ramifications. Average GHG contributions from various human activity sectors include buildings/facilities energy use (47.1%), regional surface transport (20.8%), food production (14.7%), transport fuel production (6.4%), airline transport (4.8%), long-distance freight trucking (2.8%), cement production (2.2%), and water/wastewater/waste processing (1.3%). Energy-, travel-, and key materials-consumption efficiency metrics are elucidated in these sectors; these consumption metrics are observed to be largely similar across the eight U.S. cities and consistent with national/regional averages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change
Ostrom, E. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 · Cited by 2,460
Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge
Creutzig, F., Baiocchi, G., Bierkandt, R., Pichler, P.-P., & Seto, K. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315545112 · Cited by 598
Methodology and applications of city level CO2 emission accounts in China
Shan, Y., Guan, D., Liu, J., Mi, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Schroeder, H., Cai, B., Chen, Y., Shao, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.075 · Cited by 587
Jones, C., & Kammen, D. M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4034364 · Cited by 498
The growing importance of scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry
Hertwich, E. G., & Wood, R. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae19a · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillman, T., & Ramaswami, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1902-1910
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2083942950
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Greenhouse Gas Emission Footprints and Energy Use Benchmarks for Eight U.S. Cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es9024194
- The paper
- Hillman, T., & Ramaswami, A. (2010). Greenhouse Gas Emission Footprints and Energy Use Benchmarks for Eight U.S. Cities. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9024194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.