The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silver Nanocrystallites: Biofabrication using Shewanella oneidensis, and an Evaluation of Their Comparative Toxicity on Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria
Abstract
Microorganisms have long been known to develop resistance to metal ions either by sequestering metals inside the cell or by effluxing them into the extracellular media. Here we report the biosynthesis of extracellular silver-based single nanocrystallites of well-defined composition and homogeneous morphology utilizing the gamma-proteobacterium, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, upon incubation with aqueous silver nitrate solution. Further characterization of these particles revealed that the crystals consist of small, reasonably monodispersed spheres in the 2-11 nm size range (average of 4 +/- 1.5 nm). The bactericidal effect of these nanoparticles (biogenic-Ag) is compared to chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles (colloidal-Ag and oleate capped silver nanoparticles, oleate-Ag) and assessed using Gram-negative (E. coli and S. oneidensis) and Gram-positive (B. subtilis) bacteria. Relative toxicity was based on the diameter of inhibition zone in disk diffusion tests, minimum inhibitory concentrations, live/dead assays, and atomic force microscopy. From a toxicity perspective, strain-dependent inhibition depended on the synthesis procedure and the surface coat. Biogenic-Ag was found to be of higher toxicity compared to colloidal-Ag for all three strains tested, whereas E. coli and S. oneidensis were found to be more resistant to either of these nanoparticles than B. subtilis. In contrast, oleate-Ag was not toxic to any of the bacteria. These findings have implications for the potential uses of Ag nanomaterials and for their fate in biological and environmental systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
Cited by
Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, toxicology, applications and perspectives
Tran, Q. H., Nguyen, V. Q., & Le, A.-T. (2013) · Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/2043-6262/4/3/033001 · Cited by 988
Xiu, Z.-M., Ma, J., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es201918f · Cited by 521
Bacteria in Nanoparticle Synthesis: Current Status and Future Prospects
Iravani, S. (2014) · International Scholarly Research Notices · doi:10.1155/2014/359316 · Cited by 494
Overview of Silk Fibroin Use in Wound Dressings
Farokhi, M., Mottaghitalab, F., Fatahi, Y., Khademhosseini, A., & Kaplan, D. L. (2018) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.004 · Cited by 474
Khandel, P., Yadaw, R. K., Soni, D. K., Kanwar, L., & Shahi, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s40097-018-0267-4 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Suresh, A. K., Pelletier, D. A., Wang, W., Moon, J.-W., Gu, B., Mortensen, N. P., Allison, D. P., Joy, D. C., Phelps, T. J., & Doktycz, M. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-05-28
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5210-5215
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1969006575
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.