The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of Lead and Arsenic Bioavailability Using a Physiologically Based Extraction Test
Abstract
The physiologically based extraction test (PBET) is an in vitro test system for predicting the bioavailability of metals from a solid matrix and incorporates gastrointestinal tract parameters representative of a human (including stomach and small intestinal pH and chemistry, soil-to-solution ratio, stomach mixing, and stomach emptying rates). For lead (Pb), the results of the PBET are linearly correlated with results from a Sprague-Dawley rat model ( r 2 = 0.93 between in vitro and in vivo results, n = 7). For arsenic (As), the results of the PBET are overpredicting bioavailability study results in rabbit and primate models (2−11% difference between in vitro and in vivo results, depending on the animal model). The PBET was not designed to supplant bioavailability studies using animal models, but rather to estimate Pb and As bioavailability when animal study results are not available. Dissolution of Pb in the acidic stomach environment was strongly pH dependent; the extent of dissolution decreased by 65% when stomach pH was increased from 1.3 to 2.5. Arsenic solubility decreased by only 16% over the same pH range. Lead was removed from solution to a greater extent than As by neutralization during the small intestinal simulation, consistent with adsorption and precipitation reactions occurring for Pb but not As at neutral pH values. In addition to providing mechanistic explanations for controls on Pb and As bioavailability, the PBET allows estimates of site-specific Pb and As bioavailability from soil for the purpose of exposure assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of Gastric Functions During Digestion of Ordinary Solid Meals in Man
Malagelada, J.-R., Longstreth, G. F., Summerskill, W. H. J., & Go, V. L. W. (1976) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(76)80010-8 · Cited by 338
Cited by
Selenium environmental cycling and bioavailability: A structural chemist point of view
Fernández-Martínez, A., & Charlet, L. (2009) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-009-9145-3 · Cited by 487
Neurodegenerative diseases and exposure to the environmental metals Mn, Pb, and Hg
Charlet, L., Chapron, Y., Faller, P., Kirsch, R., Stone, A. T., & Baveye, P. C. (2012) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.012 · Cited by 92
Fedotov, P. S., Kördel, W., Miró, M., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Wennrich, R., & Huang, P.-M. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2011.556544 · Cited by 78
Bioaccessibility and health risk assessment of arsenic in arsenic-enriched soils, Central India
Das, S., Jean, J.-S., & Kar, S. (2013) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.02.016 · Cited by 71
Adamo, P., Agrelli, D., & Zampella, M. (2018) · Environmental Geochemistry: Site Characterization, Data Analysis and Case Histories · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63763-5.00010-0 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruby, M. V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., & Sellstone, C. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 422-430
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1987369118
- Cited by
- 1,146
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Lead and Arsenic Bioavailability Using a Physiologically Based Extraction Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es950057z
- The paper
- Ruby, M. V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., & Sellstone, C. M. (1996). Estimation of Lead and Arsenic Bioavailability Using a Physiologically Based Extraction Test. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950057z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.