The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands
Abstract
Four terrestrial boreal forest catchments containing different types of wetlands were studied to determine their strength as sources or sinks of methylmercury (MeHg) and total mercury (THg) to downstream ecosystems and to determine if patterns seen in one year were consistent over several years. All catchments were sinks for THg. The wetland type, percentage wetland area (0−25%), or annual water yield did not appear to have a consistent effect on the magnitude of this retention. Wetland areas of the catchments were always net sources of MeHg. Unlike for THg, there were large and consistent differences in the source strength among wetland types for MeHg. These differences appeared to be related to differences in the internal hydrology of the wetlands. All types of wetlands were greater sources of MeHg during years of high water yield, but even during years of low flow all wetland types were sources of MeHg. Thus, we conclude that wetlands are important sites of MeHg production in boreal ecosystems on the long term. Upland areas of catchments were consistently sinks for MeHg, and so whole catchment sink/source values were strongly affected by the percentage of wetland areas within a catchment. Mass balance estimates of MeHg input from wetland areas to a lake indicate that the annual input of MeHg from wetlands is larger than the annual uptake of Hg by fish and is similar to the amount of MeHg produced in the lake. Because of the predictable patterns between terrestrial catch ments in their strength as sources or sinks of MeHg, it is possible to model inputs of MeHg from lake catchments with knowledge of the percentage wetland area in a catchment, the type of wetland contained in a catchment, and the annual water yield of a catchment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Riparian Zones: Potential for Improved Water Quality Management1
Vidon, P., Allan, C., Burns, D., Duval, T. P., Gurwick, N., Inamdar, S., Lowrance, R., Okay, J., Scott, D., & Sebestyen, S. (2010) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x · Cited by 508
Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001415n · Cited by 301
Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development
Rosenberg, D. M., Berkes, F., Bodaly, R. A., Hecky, R. E., Kelly, C. A., & Rudd, J. W. (1997) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a97-001 · Cited by 282
Self-citationGeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., St. Louis, V. L., Donald, D. B., & Vladicka, K. E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609798104 · Cited by 179
Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998-2005
Scudder, B. C., Chasar, L. C., Wentz, D. A., Bauch, N. J., Brigham, M. E., Moran, P. W., & Krabbenhoft, D. P. (2009) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20095109 · Cited by 139
Moreno, C. E., Fjeld, E., & Lydersen, E. (2016) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5148-z · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- St. Louis, V. L., Rudd, J. W. M., Kelly, C. A., Beaty, K. G., Flett, R. J., & Roulet, N. T.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2719-2729
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2037102663
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.