The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mimicked In-Situ Stabilization of Metals in a Cropped Soil: Bioavailability and Chemical Form of Zinc
Abstract
Agricultural lime, natural zeolite (clinoptilolite), hydroxyapatite, and an iron oxide waste byproduct (Fe-rich, a trademark name of E. I. du Pont de Nemours) were added to an artificially contaminated Appling silt loam soil to stabilize and limit the uptake of Zn by crops. A greenhouse pot study involved spiking the soil with flue dust (FD) at 0, 150, 300, 600, 1200, and 2400 mg of Zn kg - 1 . As much as 40% of the total Zn occurred in an exchangeable form, the form considered most bioavailable to plants, when the pH of the FD-spiked soil was below 6.0. The ameliorants (lime, zeolite, apatite, and Fe-rich) decreased the concentration of the exchangeable form of Zn at each level of FD in soil; however, the largest decrease occurred with the lowest dose. Maize ( Zea mays ), barley ( Hordeum vulgare ), and radish ( Raphanus sativus ) were grown to determine the effects of Zn on the plant growth and its uptake. The addition of ameliorants to soil enhanced the growth and yield of maize and barley, but only Fe-rich enhanced the growth of radish at all FD rates. Lime, zeolite, and apatite significantly reduced the Zn concentration in tissues of the 3-week-old maize, in mature maize tissues (roots, young leaves, old leaves, stems, grain), and in barley. The largest reduction (over 80%) in Zn uptake by all crops was effected by Fe-rich, which is consistent with the greatest reduction in soil-exchangeable Zn by this ameliorant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Cited by
Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils – To mobilize or to immobilize?
Bolan, N., Kunhikrishnan, A., Thangarajan, R., Kumpiene, J., Park, J., Makino, T., Kirkham, M. B., & Scheckel, K. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.018 · Cited by 2,031
Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure
Wenzel, W. W., Kirchbaumer, N., Prohaska, T., Stingeder, G., Lombi, E., & Adriano, D. C. (2001) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(01)00924-2 · Cited by 1,408
Self-citationRole of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup
Adriano, D. C., Wenzel, W. W., Vangronsveld, J., & Bolan, N. S. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.003 · Cited by 766
Self-citationBasta, N. T., & McGowen, S. L. (2004) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(03)00250-1 · Cited by 441
In situ fixation of metals in soils using bauxite residue: chemical assessment
Lombi, E., Zhao, F.-J., Zhang, G., Sun, B., Fitz, W., Zhang, H., & McGrath, S. P. (2002) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00294-9 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Chlopecka, A., & Adriano, D. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3294-3303
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2053077041
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.