The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetics and pH Dependence of Chromium(VI) Reduction by Iron(II)
Abstract
Iron(II) is one of the most important reductants of chromium(VI), a severe, toxic contaminant of natural waters, sediments, and soils. We studied the reaction kinetics between pH 2 and pH 7.2 with UV−VIS and multicomponent fitting, a method without the interference of added reagents. The reaction rate was minimal around pH 4. A rate increase with decreasing pH below 4 is documented in the literature. However, a pH-dependent kinetic expression for environmentally relevant, higher pH conditions has not been reported yet. For pH 4.4−7.2 (solutions buffered with acetate, MES, and PIPES, initial 10−20 μM Cr(VI) and 30−60 μM Fe(II), I = 0.01 M KCl, 23 ± 3 °C), we derived the following rate law: −d[Cr(VI)]/d t = k obs (pH)[Fe(II)][Cr(VI)], with k obs = (0.34 ± 0.47) M - 1 s - 1 + (3.29 ± 0.66) × 10 9 M - 2 s - 1 [OH - ] + (4.82 ± 1.53) × 10 16 M - 3 s - 1 [OH - ] 2 (standard deviations), where Cr(VI) to Cr(V) is the rate-determining step. The equivalent expression −d[Cr(VI)]/d t = ( k 1 [Fe 2+ ] + k 2 [FeOH + ] + k 3 [Fe(OH) 2 0 ])[Cr(VI)], with k 1 = (0.34 ± 0.47) M - 1 s - 1, k 2 = (1.41 ± 0.28) × 10 5 M - 1 s - 1, k 3 = (2.84 ± 0.90) × 10 9 M - 1 s - 1, provides a plausible interpretation. The kinetic constants (log k ) are related to the electron reduction potential of the corresponding aquo- and hydroxo-Fe(III)/Fe(II) redox couples, probably in a linear free enthalpy relation. Comparison to the analogous kinetic expression for Fe(II) oxygenation shows that Cr(VI) oxidizes Fe(II) faster than O 2 (for [Cr(VI)] = [O 2 ] by a factor of ≈ 3 × 10 4 at pH 4, 6 × 10 3 at pH 6, and 1 × 10 3 at pH 8).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., Giovannoni, S. J., White, D. C., Champine, J. E., Phillips, E. J. P., Gorby, Y. A., & Goodwin, S. (1993) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00290916 · Cited by 983
Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters
Fendorf, S. E. (1995) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(94)00062-f · Cited by 680
Cited by
Challenges of chromate inhibitor pigments replacement in organic coatings
Sinko, J. (2001) · Progress in Organic Coatings · doi:10.1016/s0300-9440(01)00202-8 · Cited by 494
Cr(VI) Adsorption and Reduction by Humic Acid Coated on Magnetite
Jiang, W., Cai, Q., Xu, W., Yang, M., Cai, Y., Dionysiou, D. D., & O’Shea, K. E. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405804m · Cited by 462
Jiang, B., Gong, Y., Gao, J., Sun, T., Liu, Y., Oturan, N., & Oturan, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.070 · Cited by 365
Spectroscopic Investigation of Cr(III)- and Cr(VI)-Treated Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron
Manning, B. A., Kiser, J. R., Kwon, H., & Kanel, S. R. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es061721m · Cited by 310
Chromium(VI) Reduction by Hydrogen Sulfide in Aqueous Media: Stoichiometry and Kinetics
Kim, C., Zhou, Q., Deng, B., Thornton, E. C., & Xu, H. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0017007 · Cited by 296
Influence of Organic Ligands on Chromium(VI) Reduction by Iron(II)
Buerge, I. J., & Hug, S. J. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es970932b · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buerge, I. J., & Hug, S. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-04-29
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1426-1432
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2008007409
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.