Cited by 115

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Predominant Reductants in an Anaerobic Leachate-Contaminated Aquifer by Nitroaromatic Probe Compounds

Rügge, Kirsten, Hofstetter, Thomas B., Haderlein, Stefan B., Bjerg, Poul L., Knudsen, Søren, Zraunig, Claudia, Mosbæk, Hans, Christensen, Thomas H.·1998·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The biogeochemical processes controlling the reductive transformation of contaminants in an anaerobic aquifer were inferred from the relative reactivity patterns of redox-sensitive probe compounds. The fate of five nitroaromatic compounds (NACs) was monitored under different redox conditions in a landfill leachate plume of a sandy aquifer. Results of field experiments (continuous injection and in situ microcosms) were compared to the findings of laboratory batch and column experiments (using aquifer matrix and model systems for sulfate- and iron-reducing conditions). NACs were transformed within 2−70 days in the leachate plume as well as in microbially active and in microbially deactivated experiments. Generally, aromatic amines were the predominant reduction products, and these compounds were stable within the time frame and under the conditions of our experiments. Despite the presence of various potential reductants (e.g., H 2 S/HS -, Fe(II) aq, reduced organic matter, microorganisms), the patterns of relative reactivity of the probe compounds indicated that ferrous iron associated with iron(III) (hydr)oxide surfaces was the dominant reductant throughout the anaerobic region of the plume. Our results suggest that Fe(II) associated with ferric iron minerals is a highly reactive reductant in anaerobic aquifers, which may also determine the fate of other classes of reducible contaminants such as halogenated solvents, azo compounds, sulfoxides, chromate, or arsenate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es970249p

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Haderlein, S. B.; Schwarzenbach, R. P. InBiodegradation of Nitroaromatic Compounds; Spain, J., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1995; pp 199−225. · DOI
  2. Larson R. A., 1994, Reaction Mechanisms in Environmental Organic Chemistry
  3. Macalady D. L., 1986, J. Contam. Hydrol., 1, 28, 10.1016/0169-7722(86)90004-5 · DOI
  4. Schwarzenbach R. P., 1993, Environmental Organic Chemistry
  5. Dunnivant F. M., 1992, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 2141
  6. Klausen J., 1995, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 2404, 10.1021/es00009a036 · DOI
  7. Achtnich C., 1995, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 19, 72, 10.1007/BF00336349 · DOI
  8. Ludvigsen, L.; Heron, G.; Albrechtsen, H.J.; Christensen, T. H. InIntrinsic Bioremediation: Hinchee, R. E., Wilson, J. T., Downey, D. C., Eds.; Battelle Press: Columbus, OH, 1995; pp 135−142.
  9. Postma D., 1996, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 3175, 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00156-1 · DOI
  10. Schwarzenbach R. P., 1990, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 1574, 10.1021/es00080a017 · DOI
  11. Heron G., J. Contam. Hydrol. in press.
  12. Nielsen P. H., 1996, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 16, 140, 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1996.tb00580.x · DOI
  13. Lyngkilde J., 1992, J. Contam. Hydrol., 10, 289
  14. Pecher K., 1997, Symsposium on Redox Reactions in Natural and Engineered Aqueous Systems, 187
  15. Heijman C. G., 1995, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 783, 10.1021/es00003a027 · DOI
  16. Nielsen P., 1995, J. Contam. Hydrol., 20, 50
  17. Hofstetter T. B., 1997, Symposium on Redox Reactions in Natural and Engineered Aqueous Systems, 119
  18. Bjerg P. L., 1997, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering
  19. Weissmahr K. W., 1997, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 247, 10.1021/es960381+ · DOI
  20. Haderlein S. B., 1993, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 326, 10.1021/es00039a012 · DOI
  21. Haderlein S. B., 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 622, 10.1021/es9503701 · DOI
  22. Nielsen P. H., 1995, J. Contam. Hydrol., 20, 66
  23. Rügge, K.; Bjerg, P. L.; Mosbæk, H.; Christensen, T. H. In: Intrinsic Bioremediation: Hinchee, R. E., Wilson, J. T., Downey, D. C., Eds.; Battelle Press: Columbus, OH, 1995; pp 127−133.
  24. March J., Advanced Organic Chemistry, 1992
  25. Schnell S., 1991, Arch. Microbiol., 155, 190
  26. Kuhn E. P., 1989, Hazard Waste Hazard. Mater., 6, 133
  27. Weber E. J., 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2763

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Metadata

Authors
Rügge, K., Hofstetter, T. B., Haderlein, S. B., Bjerg, P. L., Knudsen, S., Zraunig, C., Mosbæk, H., & Christensen, T. H.
Affiliations
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering/Groundwater Research Centre, Building 115, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark, and Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG) and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
23-31
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
Cited by
115
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review