The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Predominant Reductants in an Anaerobic Leachate-Contaminated Aquifer by Nitroaromatic Probe Compounds
Abstract
The biogeochemical processes controlling the reductive transformation of contaminants in an anaerobic aquifer were inferred from the relative reactivity patterns of redox-sensitive probe compounds. The fate of five nitroaromatic compounds (NACs) was monitored under different redox conditions in a landfill leachate plume of a sandy aquifer. Results of field experiments (continuous injection and in situ microcosms) were compared to the findings of laboratory batch and column experiments (using aquifer matrix and model systems for sulfate- and iron-reducing conditions). NACs were transformed within 2−70 days in the leachate plume as well as in microbially active and in microbially deactivated experiments. Generally, aromatic amines were the predominant reduction products, and these compounds were stable within the time frame and under the conditions of our experiments. Despite the presence of various potential reductants (e.g., H 2 S/HS -, Fe(II) aq, reduced organic matter, microorganisms), the patterns of relative reactivity of the probe compounds indicated that ferrous iron associated with iron(III) (hydr)oxide surfaces was the dominant reductant throughout the anaerobic region of the plume. Our results suggest that Fe(II) associated with ferric iron minerals is a highly reactive reductant in anaerobic aquifers, which may also determine the fate of other classes of reducible contaminants such as halogenated solvents, azo compounds, sulfoxides, chromate, or arsenate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Largely through the activity of DIRB, Fe(II) is typically one of the most abundant reductants present in aquatic and terrestrial environments under suboxic and anoxic conditions [124-126], often providing substantial redox buffering capacity to these systems.”
From Electron Donor Utilization and Secondary Mineral Formation during the Bioreduction of Lepidocrocite by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 (2019) · cites this paper as [126]
Citations
Cites
Reduction potentials of one-electron couples involving free radicals in aqueous solution
Wardman, P. (1989) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555843 · Cited by 2,123
Bjerg, P. L., Ruegge, K., Pedersen, J. K., & Christensen, T. H. (1995) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00005a035 · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Haderlein, S. B.; Schwarzenbach, R. P. InBiodegradation of Nitroaromatic Compounds; Spain, J., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1995; pp 199−225. · DOI
- Larson R. A., 1994, Reaction Mechanisms in Environmental Organic Chemistry
- Macalady D. L., 1986, J. Contam. Hydrol., 1, 28, 10.1016/0169-7722(86)90004-5 · DOI
- Schwarzenbach R. P., 1993, Environmental Organic Chemistry
- Dunnivant F. M., 1992, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 2141
- Klausen J., 1995, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 2404, 10.1021/es00009a036 · DOI
- Achtnich C., 1995, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 19, 72, 10.1007/BF00336349 · DOI
- Ludvigsen, L.; Heron, G.; Albrechtsen, H.J.; Christensen, T. H. InIntrinsic Bioremediation: Hinchee, R. E., Wilson, J. T., Downey, D. C., Eds.; Battelle Press: Columbus, OH, 1995; pp 135−142.
- Postma D., 1996, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 3175, 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00156-1 · DOI
- Schwarzenbach R. P., 1990, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 1574, 10.1021/es00080a017 · DOI
- Heron G., J. Contam. Hydrol. in press.
- Nielsen P. H., 1996, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 16, 140, 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1996.tb00580.x · DOI
- Lyngkilde J., 1992, J. Contam. Hydrol., 10, 289
- Pecher K., 1997, Symsposium on Redox Reactions in Natural and Engineered Aqueous Systems, 187
- Heijman C. G., 1995, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 783, 10.1021/es00003a027 · DOI
- Nielsen P., 1995, J. Contam. Hydrol., 20, 50
- Hofstetter T. B., 1997, Symposium on Redox Reactions in Natural and Engineered Aqueous Systems, 119
- Bjerg P. L., 1997, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering
- Weissmahr K. W., 1997, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 247, 10.1021/es960381+ · DOI
- Haderlein S. B., 1993, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 326, 10.1021/es00039a012 · DOI
- Haderlein S. B., 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 622, 10.1021/es9503701 · DOI
- Nielsen P. H., 1995, J. Contam. Hydrol., 20, 66
- Rügge, K.; Bjerg, P. L.; Mosbæk, H.; Christensen, T. H. In: Intrinsic Bioremediation: Hinchee, R. E., Wilson, J. T., Downey, D. C., Eds.; Battelle Press: Columbus, OH, 1995; pp 127−133.
- March J., Advanced Organic Chemistry, 1992
- Schnell S., 1991, Arch. Microbiol., 155, 190
- Kuhn E. P., 1989, Hazard Waste Hazard. Mater., 6, 133
- Weber E. J., 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2763
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mohatt, J. L., Hu, L., Finneran, K. T., & Strathmann, T. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200413g · Cited by 160
O’Loughlin, E. J., Gorski, C. A., Flynn, T. M., & Scherer, M. M. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9070434 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Rügge, K., Hofstetter, T. B., Haderlein, S. B., Bjerg, P. L., Knudsen, S., Zraunig, C., Mosbæk, H., & Christensen, T. H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Environmental Science and Engineering/Groundwater Research Centre, Building 115, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark, and Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG) and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 0013-936X
- 1520-5851
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review