The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide on Iron Oxide: Kinetics, Mechanism, and Implications
Abstract
This research describes the heterogeneous catalytic reactions of H 2 O 2 with granular size goethite (α-FeOOH) particles in aqueous solution under various experimental conditions. This is an important reaction for the environment since both H 2 O 2 and iron oxides are common constituents of natural and atmospheric waters. Furthermore, iron oxides function as catalysts in chemical oxidation processes used for treatment of contaminated waters with H 2 O 2 . The results of this study demonstrated that the decomposition rate of H 2 O 2 over goethite surface can be described by the second-order kinetic expression −d[H 2 O 2 ]/d t = k [FeOOH][H 2 O 2 ], where k = 0.031 M - 1 s - 1, at pH 7 in the absence of any inorganic or organic chemical species. The apparent reaction rate was dominated by the intrinsic reaction rates on the oxide surfaces rather than the mass transfer rate of H 2 O 2 to the surface. The activation energy of the reaction of H 2 O 2 with the iron oxide surface was determined to be 32.8 kJ/M. The reaction mechanism for the decomposition of H 2 O 2 on goethite surface was proposed on the basis of the fundamental reactions describing the surface complexation chemistry for iron oxide and the interaction of H 2 O 2 with the surface sites. The kinetic model, which was developed according to the proposed mechanism, was found to be similar to the classical Langmuir−Hinshelwood rate model. The model was calibrated and verified successfully. For low concentrations of H 2 O 2, the Langmuir−Hinshelwood model is reduced to the observed second-order kinetic expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Acidic mine drainage: the rate-determining step
Singer, P. C., & Stumm, W. (1970) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.167.3921.1121 · Cited by 1,757
Cited by
Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes
Bokare, A. D., & Choi, W. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.054 · Cited by 2,368
Clays and oxide minerals as catalysts and nanocatalysts in Fenton-like reactions — A review
Garrido-Ramírez, E. G., Theng, B. K. G., & Mora, M. L. (2010) · Applied Clay Science · doi:10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.044 · Cited by 893
Heterogeneous Fenton catalysts: A review of recent advances
Thomas, N., Dionysiou, D. D., & Pillai, S. C. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124082 · Cited by 889
Interfacial mechanisms of heterogeneous Fenton reactions catalyzed by iron-based materials: A review
He, J., Yang, X., Men, B., & Wang, D. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.003 · Cited by 587
Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Li, M., Fan, J., & Zhao, G. (2014) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.017 · Cited by 451
The missing organic molecules on Mars
Benner, S. A., Devine, K. G., Matveeva, L. N., & Powell, D. H. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.040539497 · Cited by 422
Reactive oxygen species-related activities of nano-iron metal and nano-iron oxides
Wu, H., Yin, J.-J., Wamer, W. G., Zeng, M., & Lo, Y. M. (2014) · Journal of Food and Drug Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.007 · Cited by 257
Kurian, M., & Nair, D. S. (2015) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.10.011 · Cited by 112
Lu, X., Zhao, J., Wang, Q., Wang, D., Xu, H., Ma, J., Qiu, W., & Hu, T. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.114969 · Cited by 85
Truskewycz, A., Shukla, R., & Ball, A. S. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.10.008 · Cited by 69
Gualtieri, A. F., Andreozzi, G. B., Tomatis, M., & Turci, F. (2019) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.023 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, S.-S., & Gurol, M. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-04-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1417-1423
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2080365537
- Cited by
- 1,001
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.