The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytoextraction of Zinc by Oat (Avena sativa), Barley (Hordeum vulgare), and Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea)
Abstract
The success of phytoremediation hinges on the selection of plant species and soil amendments that maximize contaminant removal. Indian mustard ( Brassica juncea ) has been shown to be effective in phytoextracting Zn, particularly after the synthetic chelate EDTA has been applied to the soil. However, the effectiveness of grass species for phytoremediation has not been addressed in great detail. A hydroponic screening of 22 grass species indicated that oat ( Avena sativa ) and barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) tolerated the high Cu, Cd, and Zn concentrations present in the solution and also accumulated elevated concentrations of these metals in the plant shoots. A hydroponic experiment comparing these two grasses to Indian mustard indicated that, although shoot Zn concentrations were greater for Indian mustard, the grasses were considerably more tolerant. A pot experiment conducted using a Zn-contaminated soil showed that the addition of EDTA to the soil significantly increased Zn accumulation by B. juncea but not oat or barley. Nevertheless, barley accumulated >2 mg of Zn plant - 1, 2−4 times more Zn than what was observed in Indian mustard in the presence of EDTA. The results of this experiment suggest that barley has a phytoremediation potential equal to, if not greater than, that for B. juncea .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation
HUANG, J. W., & CUNNINGHAM, S. D. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01147.x · Cited by 622
Cited by
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides
McGrath, S. P., Zhao, J., & Lombi, E. (2002) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(02)75002-5 · Cited by 506
Heavy metals and soil microbes
Abdu, N., Abdullahi, A. A., & Abdulkadir, A. (2017) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x · Cited by 478
Wu, L. H., Luo, Y. M., Xing, X. R., & Christie, P. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.002 · Cited by 373
Assessment of Pb and Cd in seed oils and meals and methodology of their extraction
Yang, Y., Li, H., Peng, L., Chen, Z., & Zeng, Q. (2016) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.143 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebbs, S. D., & Kochian, L. V.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-01-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 802-806
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2009286775
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
