The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chelate-Assisted Pb Phytoextraction: Pb Availability, Uptake, and Translocation Constraints
Abstract
Chelates have been shown to enhance phytoextraction of Pb from contaminated soil. Mechanisms behind this phenomenon, however, remain largely unexplored. In this paper we examine chelate effect on Pb dissolution, plant Pb uptake, and internal plant Pb translocation. EDTA was found to be the most efficient in increasing water-soluble Pb concentration in our test soil. Unfortunately, Pb−EDTA is highly water-soluble and poses potential risks to groundwater in its application. In addition, it would not appear to be ideally suited for plant uptake and translocation based upon the relative water solubility of Pb-EDTA. We demonstrated that N, N ‘-di(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine N, N ‘-diacetic acid (HBED) resulted in Zea mays root Pb content significantly higher than did EDTA, indicating that a chelate better than EDTA might be designed. Fortuitously, EDTA appears to increase overall plant transpiration, the driving force in phytoextraction of the Pb−chelate complex from soil. We also found that there was a significant increase in Pb uptake and translocation for corn transplanted into soil, then treated with EDTA, as compared to plants germinated and grown in Pb-contaminated soil to which EDTA was subsequently applied. These results demonstrate that significant improvement over current chelate-assisted phytoextraction of Pb may be possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation
HUANG, J. W., & CUNNINGHAM, S. D. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01147.x · Cited by 622
Self-citation
Cited by
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Lead toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation
Zulfiqar, U., Farooq, M., Hussain, S., Maqsood, M., Hussain, M., Ishfaq, M., Ahmad, M., & Anjum, M. Z. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109557 · Cited by 566
Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides
McGrath, S. P., Zhao, J., & Lombi, E. (2002) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(02)75002-5 · Cited by 506
Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments
Mendez, M. O., & Maier, R. M. (2008) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-007-9125-4 · Cited by 435
Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation
Kidd, P., Barceló, J., Bernal, M. P., Navari-Izzo, F., Poschenrieder, C., Shilev, S., Clemente, R., & Monterroso, C. (2009) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.013 · Cited by 395
Wu, L. H., Luo, Y. M., Xing, X. R., & Christie, P. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.002 · Cited by 373
Schmidt, U. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2003.1939 · Cited by 340
David, N., Leatherbarrow, J. E., Yee, D., & McKee, L. J. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000921 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J., Hsu, F. C., & Cunningham, S. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-14
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1898-1904
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2049468190
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.