The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for an Additional Oxidant in the Photoassisted Fenton Reaction
Abstract
The photo-Fenton reaction (Fe 3+ + H 2 O 2 + UV) has potential applications in wastewater treatment. This reaction was compared to H 2 O 2 photolysis and other reactions that produce only hydroxyl radicals (OH • ) in order to probe for additional or alternative intermediates that may contribute to the recognized potency of photo-Fenton as an oxidant of organic compounds. Distinct differences were found between photo-Fenton and genuine OH • reactions. The kinetic deuterium isotope effect (KDIE) for cyclohexane in the photo-Fenton reaction increases from 1.2 to 1.4 with increasing concentration of OH • scavenger, tert -butyl alcohol; whereas the KDIE in genuine OH • reactions (H 2 O 2 /UV, Fe 3+ /UV, and Fe 2+ + H 2 O 2 ) is 1.1 and unchanged in the presence of tert -butyl alcohol. Photo-Fenton catalyzed the epoxidation of cyclohexene at a much greater rate than H 2 O 2 /UV. The relative yields of chlorinated organic acids from 1,1,2-trichloroethane, trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene oxidation were markedly affected by the presence of iron. Time-resolved laser flash photolysis spectroscopy in the absence of organics revealed a transient, seen only in Fe 3+ + H 2 O 2 solutions, with broad absorbance in the visible and a lifetime of ∼100 ns. The results suggest the participation of a high-valent oxoiron complex (ferryl) in addition to OH • in organic compound oxidations. Hydrogen peroxide forms a complex with iron, Fe(O 2 H) 2+ ( K 15 = 1.15 × 10 - 2 ), that absorbs in the visible region and could be the precursor of the ferryl complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Cited by
Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review
Chong, M. N., Jin, B., Chow, C. W. K., & Saint, C. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 · Cited by 5,386
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Self-citationElectro-Fenton Process and Related Electrochemical Technologies Based on Fenton’s Reaction Chemistry
Brillas, E., Sirés, I., & Oturan, M. A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900136g · Cited by 3,437
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends
Malato, S., Fernández-Ibáñez, P., Maldonado, M. I., Blanco, J., & Gernjak, W. (2009) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,004
Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2004) · Advances in Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(03)00032-7 · Cited by 1,737
Metadata
- Authors
- Pignatello, J. J., Liu, D., & Huston, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-21
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1832-1839
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2067807920
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for an Additional Oxidant in the Photoassisted Fenton Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es980969b
- The paper
- Pignatello, J. J., Liu, D., & Huston, P. (1999). Evidence for an Additional Oxidant in the Photoassisted Fenton Reaction. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980969b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.