The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibition of Precipitation and Aggregation of Metacinnabar (Mercuric Sulfide) by Dissolved Organic Matter Isolated from the Florida Everglades
Abstract
Precipitation and aggregation of metacinnabar (black HgS) was inhibited in the presence of low concentrations (≥3 mg C/L) of humic fractions of dissolved organic matter (DOM) isolated from the Florida Everglades. At low Hg concentrations (≤5 × 10 - 8 M), DOM prevented the precipitation of metacinnabar. At moderate Hg concentrations (5 × 10 - 5 M), DOM inhibited the aggregation of colloidal metacinnabar (Hg passed through a 0.1 μm filter but was removed by centrifugation). At Hg concentrations greater than 5 × 10 - 4 M, mercury formed solid metacinnabar particles that were removed from solution by a 0.1 μm filter. Organic matter rich in aromatic moieties was preferentially removed with the solid. Hydrophobic organic acids (humic and fulvic acids) inhibited aggregation better than hydrophilic organic acids. The presence of chloride, acetate, salicylate, EDTA, and cysteine did not inhibit the precipitation or aggregation of metacinnabar. Calcium enhanced metacinnabar aggregation even in the presence of DOM, but the magnitude of the effect was dependent on the concentrations of DOM, Hg, and Ca. Inhibition of metacinnabar precipitation appears to be a result of strong DOM-Hg binding. Prevention of aggregation of colloidal particles appears to be caused by adsorption of DOM and electrostatic repulsion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKnight, D. M., Bencala, K. E., Zellweger, G. W., Aiken, G. R., Feder, G. L., & Thorn, K. A. (1992) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00031a017 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Cited by
Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review
Ravichandran, M. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citationInteractions of Dissolved Organic Matter with Natural and Engineered Inorganic Colloids: A Review
Philippe, A., & Schaumann, G. E. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502342r · Cited by 770
Wiener, J., Krabbenhoft, D., Heinz, G., & Scheuhammer, A. (2002) · Handbook of Ecotoxicology, Second Edition · doi:10.1201/9781420032505.ch16 · Cited by 656
Haitzer, M., Aiken, G. R., & Ryan, J. N. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es025699i · Cited by 434
Self-citationDissolved Organic Matter Enhances Microbial Mercury Methylation Under Sulfidic Conditions
Graham, A. M., Aiken, G. R., & Gilmour, C. C. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203658f · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravichandran, M., Aiken, G. R., Ryan, J. N., & Reddy, M. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-03-24
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1418-1423
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2018473619
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.