The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer Reviewed: Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment
Abstract
Process and product models are commonly used for performing life-cycle assessments (LCAs) of the environmental impacts of materials and products through different stages of fabrication, use, and end-of-life options. In this article, we show that these models can be represented as process flow diagrams or as matrices of process interactions. In either representation, the inventory of environmental emissions and resources used is comparable, provided the process models are proportional in nature (any increase in product output produces a corresponding environmental burden). Matrix representations are advantageous if application cost, feedback flow, or speed of analysis is important. They are also useful in conjunction with comprehensive, general equilibrium models in which the system boundary of the problem (e.g., an LCA of a product) being analyzed is on the level of the national economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leontief, W. W. (1951) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1051-15 · Cited by 1,492
Life-Cycle Assessment : Inventory Guidelines and Principles
Vigon, B. W., Tolle, D. A., Cornaby, B. W., Latham, H. C., Harrison, C. L., Boguski, T. L., Hunt, R. G., & Sellers, J. D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 378
Hendrickson, C. T., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., Klausner, M., Lave, L. B., & McMichael, F. C. (2002) · IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (ISEE) · doi:10.1109/isee.1997.605313 · Cited by 102
Self-citationThe Structure of the Chemical Processing Industries.
Russell, T. W. F. (1979) · Chemical Engineering Education · Cited by 23
Cited by
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citationReap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0008-x · Cited by 934
Carbon emission of global construction sector
Huang, L., Krigsvoll, G., Johansen, F., Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.001 · Cited by 890
Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories
Lenzen, M. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/10881980052541981 · Cited by 757
Turconi, R., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013 · Cited by 757
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., & Lave, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 184A-191A
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W88898997
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
