The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations
Open accessAbstract
Electricity generation is a key contributor to global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), NOx and SO2 and their related environmental impact. A critical review of 167 case studies involving the life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation based on hard coal, lignite, natural gas, oil, nuclear, biomass, hydroelectric, solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind was carried out to identify ranges of emission data for GHG, NOx and SO2 related to individual technologies. It was shown that GHG emissions could not be used as a single indicator to represent the environmental performance of a system or technology. Emission data were evaluated with respect to three life cycle phases (fuel provision, plant operation, and infrastructure). Direct emissions from plant operation represented the majority of the life cycle emissions for fossil fuel technologies, whereas fuel provision represented the largest contribution for biomass technologies (71% for GHG, 54% for NOx and 61% for SO2) and nuclear power (60% for GHG, 82% for NOx and 92% for SO2); infrastructures provided the highest impact for renewables. These data indicated that all three phases should be included for completeness and to avoid problem shifting. The most critical methodological aspects in relation to LCA studies were identified as follows: definition of the functional unit, the LCA method employed (e.g., IOA, PCA and hybrid), the emission allocation principle and/or system boundary expansion. The most important technological aspects were identified as follows: the energy recovery efficiency and the flue gas cleaning system for fossil fuel technologies; the electricity mix used during both the manufacturing and the construction phases for nuclear and renewable technologies; and the type, quality and origin of feedstock, as well as the amount and type of co-products, for biomass-based systems. This review demonstrates that the variability of existing LCA results for electricity generation can give rise to conflicting decisions regarding the environmental consequences of implementing new technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Klüppel, H.-J. (2005) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2005.03.001 · Cited by 4,639
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals
Cherubini, F. (2010) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015 · Cited by 2,229
IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation
Revel, D. (2011) · OpenEdition (OpenEdition) · doi:10.58079/o8wx · Cited by 2,175
Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies
Evans, A., Strezov, V., & Evans, T. J. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008 · Cited by 1,023
Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., & Woess-Gallasch, S. (2009) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013 · Cited by 973
Peng, J., Lu, L., & Yang, H. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035 · Cited by 772
A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies
Weisser, D. (2007) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.008 · Cited by 758
Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product
Suh, S., & Huppes, G. (2005) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001 · Cited by 710
Cited by
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment
Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A., et al. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205 · Cited by 752
Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery
Stolaroff, J. K., Samaras, C., O’Neill, E. R., Lubers, A., Mitchell, A. S., & Ceperley, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02411-5 · Cited by 518
Moro, A., & Lonza, L. (2018) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.012 · Cited by 492
Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – What does the evidence say?
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036 · Cited by 483
Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Abdelhaleem, A., Ihara, I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Yap, P.-S., & Rooney, D. W. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Turconi, R., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 555-565
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062231378
- Cited by
- 757
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 28.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013
- The paper
- Turconi, R., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. (2013). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.