Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuning CO2 Selective Adsorption over N2 and CH4 in UiO-67 Analogues through Ligand Functionalization

Wang, Bin, Huang, Hongliang, Lv, Xiu-Liang, Xie, Yabo, Li, Ming, Li, Jian-Rong·2014·Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

Introducing functional groups into pores of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) through ligand modification provides an efficacious approach for tuning gas adsorption and separation performances of this type of novel porous material. In this work, two UiO-67 analogues, [Zr6O4(OH)4(FDCA)6] (BUT-10) and [Zr6O4(OH)4(DTDAO)6] (BUT-11), with functionalized pore surfaces and high stability were synthesized from two functional ligands, 9-fluorenone-2,7-dicarboxylic acid (H2FDCA) and dibenzo[b,d]thiophene-3,7-dicarboxylic acid 5,5-dioxide (H2DTDAO), respectively, and structurally determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Notwithstanding skeleton bend of the two ligands relative to the linear 4,4'-biphenyldicarboxylic acid in UiO-67, the two MOFs have structures similar to that of UiO-67, with only lowered symmetry in their frameworks. Attributed to these additional functional groups (carbonyl and sulfone, respectively) in the ligands, BUT-10 and -11 show enhanced CO2 adsorption and separation selectivities over N2 and CH4, in spite of decreased pore sizes and surface areas compared with UiO-67. At 298 K and 1 atm, the CO2 uptake is 22.9, 50.6, and 53.5 cm(3)/g, and the infinite dilution selectivities of CO2/CH4 are 2.7, 5.1, and 9.0 and those of CO2/N2 are 9.4, 18.6, and 31.5 for UiO-67, BUT-10, and BUT-11, respectively. The selectivities of CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 are thus enhanced 1.9 and 2.0 times in BUT-10 and 3.3 and 3.4 times in BUT-11, respectively, on the basis of UiO-67. The adsorption mechanism of CO2 in BUT-11 has also been explored through computational simulations. The results show that CO2 molecules locate around the sulfone groups in pore surfaces of BUT-11, verifying at the molecular level that sulfone groups significantly increase the affinity toward CO2 molecules of the framework. This provides thus an efficient strategy for the design of CO2 capture materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ic5013473

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, B., Huang, H., Lv, X.-L., Xie, Y., Li, M., & Li, J.-R.
Venue
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2014-08-12
Volume
53
Issue
17
Pages
9254-9259
ISSN
  • 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-510X
OpenAlex
W2329775500
Cited by
278
References
2
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.