Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental and Theoretical Comparison of Actinide and Lanthanide Bonding in M[N(EPR2)2]3 Complexes (M = U, Pu, La, Ce; E = S, Se, Te; R = Ph, i Pr, H)

Gaunt, Andrew J., Reilly, Sean D., Enriquez, Alejandro E., Scott, Brian L., Ibers, James A., Sekar, Perumal, Ingram, Kieran I. M., Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas, Neu, Mary P.·2008·Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

Treatment of M[N(SiMe3)2]3 (M = U, Pu (An); La, Ce (Ln)) with NH(EPPh2)2 and NH(EPiPr2)2 (E = S, Se), afforded the neutral complexes M[N(EPR2)2]3 (R = Ph, iPr). Tellurium donor complexes were synthesized by treatment of MI3(sol)4 (M = U, Pu; sol = py and M = La, Ce; sol = thf) with Na(tmeda)[N(TePiPr2)2]. The complexes have been structurally and spectroscopically characterized with concomitant computational modeling through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The An-E bond lengths are shorter than the Ln-E bond lengths for metal ions of similar ionic radii, consistent with an increase in covalent interactions in the actinide bonding relative to the lanthanide bonding. In addition, the magnitude of the differences in the bonding is slightly greater with increasing softness of the chalcogen donor atom. The DFT calculations for the model systems correlate well with experimentally determined metrical parameters. They indicate that the enhanced covalency in the M-E bond as group 16 is descended arises mostly from increased metal d-orbital participation. Conversely, an increase in f-orbital participation is responsible for the enhancement of covalency in An-E bonds compared to Ln-E bonds. The fundamental and practical importance of such studies of the role of the valence d and f orbitals in the bonding of the f elements is emphasized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ic701618a

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Gaunt, A. J., Reilly, S. D., Enriquez, A. E., Scott, B. L., Ibers, J. A., Sekar, P., Ingram, K. I. M., Kaltsoyannis, N., & Neu, M. P.
Venue
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2007-11-20
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
29-41
ISSN
  • 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-510X
OpenAlex
W1971178956
Cited by
201
References
3
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental and Theoretical Comparison of Actinide and Lanthanide Bonding in M[N(EPR2)2]3 Complexes (M = U, Pu, La, Ce; E = S, Se, Te; R = Ph, i Pr, H). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ic701618a
The paper
Gaunt, A. J., Reilly, S. D., Enriquez, A. E., Scott, B. L., Ibers, J. A., Sekar, P., Ingram, K. I. M., Kaltsoyannis, N., & Neu, M. P. (2008). Experimental and Theoretical Comparison of Actinide and Lanthanide Bonding in M[N(EPR2)2]3 Complexes (M = U, Pu, La, Ce; E = S, Se, Te; R = Ph, i Pr, H). Inorganic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic701618a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.