Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Calculation of Zero-Field Splittings, g-Values, and the Relativistic Nephelauxetic Effect in Transition Metal Complexes. Application to High-Spin Ferric Complexes

Neese, Frank, Solomon, Edward I.·1998·Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

Equations are derived and discussed that allow the computation of zero-field splitting (ZFS) tensors in transition metal complexes for any value of the ground-state total spin S. An effective Hamiltonian technique is used and the calculation is carried to second order for orbitally nondegenerate ground states. The theory includes contributions from excited states of spin S and S +/- 1. This makes the theory more general than earlier treatments. Explicit equations are derived for the case where all states are well described by single-determinantal wave functions, for example restricted open shell Hartree-Fock (HF) and spin-polarized HF or density functional (DFT) calculation schemes. Matrix elements are evaluated for many electron wave functions that result from a molecular orbital (MO) treatment including configuration interaction (CI). A computational implementation in terms of bonded functions is outlined. The problem of ZFS in high-spin ferric complexes is treated at some length, and contributions due to low-symmetry distortions, anisotropic covalency, charge-transfer states, and ligand spin-orbit coupling are discussed. ROHF-INDO/S-CI results are presented for FeCl(4)(-) and used to evaluate the importance of the various terms. Finally, contributions to the experimentally observed reduction of the metal spin-orbit coupling constants (the relativistic nephelauxetic effect) are discussed. B3LYP and Hartree-Fock calculations for FeCl(4)(-) are used to characterize the change of the iron 3d radial function upon complex formation. It is found that the iron 3d radial distribution function is significantly expanded and that the expansion is anisotropic. This is interpreted as a combination of reduction in effective charge on the metal 3d electrons (central field covalence) together with expansive promotion effects that are a necessary consequence of chemical bond formation. The (3d) values that are important in the interpretation of magnetic data are up to 15% reduced from their free-ion value before any metal-ligand orbital mixing (symmetry-restricted covalency) is taken into account. Thus the use of free-ion values for spin-orbit coupling and related constants in the analysis of experimental data leads to values for MO coefficients that overestimate the metal-ligand covalency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ic980948i

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Neese, F., & Solomon, E. I.
Venue
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
37
Issue
26
Pages
6568-6582
ISSN
  • 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-510X
OpenAlex
W2069839767
Cited by
354
References
2
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.