The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling Ophthalmic Drug Delivery by Soaked Contact Lenses
Abstract
Approximately 90% of all ophthalmic drug formulations are now applied as eye drops. While eye drops are convenient and well-accepted by patients, ∼95% of the drug contained in the drops is lost due to absorption through the conjunctiva or through the tear drainage. Ophthalmic drug delivery via contact lenses is more effective because it increases the residence time of the drug in the eye and leads to a larger fractional intake of drug by the cornea. In this paper, we model the drug release from the contact lens into the pre- and postlens tear films and the subsequent uptake by the cornea. The motion of the contact lens, which is driven by the eyelid motion during a blink, enhances the mass transfer in the postlens tear film (POLTF). We use regular perturbation methods to obtain the Taylor dispersion coefficient for mass transfer in the POLTF. The diffusion of drug in the gel is assumed to obey Fick's law, and the diffusion in the gel and the mass transfer in the POLTF are combined to yield an integro-differential equation that is solved numerically by finite difference. Two extreme cases are considered in this paper. The first case corresponds to a rapid breakup of the prelens tear film (PLTF) that prevents drug loss from the anterior lens surface into the PLTF. The second case corresponds to a situation in which the prelens tear film exists at all times and, furthermore, the mixing and the tear drainage in the blink ensure that the concentration in this film is zero at all times. These two cases correspond to the minimum and the maximum loss to the prelens tear film and, thus, represent the highest and the lowest estimations for the fraction of the entrapped drug that diffuses into the cornea. Results show that the dispersion coefficient of the drug in the postlens tear film is unaffected by the release of the drug from the gel. Furthermore, simulation results show that drug delivery from a contact lens is more efficient than drug delivery by drops. The fraction of drug that enters the cornea varies from ∼70 to 95% for the first case (no flux to the PLTF) and from 20 to 35% for the second case (zero concentration in the PLTF). The model predicts that delivery of pilocarpine by soaked contact lenses is ∼35 times more efficient than delivery by drops, and this result matches clinical observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peng, C.-C., Kim, J., & Chauhan, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.113 · Cited by 263
Self-citationNguyen, D. C. T., Dowling, J., Ryan, R., McLoughlin, P., & Fitzhenry, L. (2021) · Contact Lens and Anterior Eye · doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.101487 · Cited by 61
Devi, S., Saini, V., Kumar, M., Bhatt, S., Gupta, S., & Deep, A. (2019) · Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology · doi:10.2174/2211738507666190726162000 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C.-C., & Chauhan, A.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-04-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3718-3734
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2006894346
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Ophthalmic Drug Delivery by Soaked Contact Lenses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie0507934
- The paper
- Li, C.-C., & Chauhan, A. (2006). Modeling Ophthalmic Drug Delivery by Soaked Contact Lenses. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0507934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.