The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical Looping Combustion in a 10 kWth Prototype Using a CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carrier: Effect of Operating Conditions on Methane Combustion
Open accessAbstract
Chemical looping combustion (CLC) currently is an attractive option to decrease the greenhouse gas emissions that affect global warming, because it is a combustion process with inherent CO 2 separation and with low energy losses. The CLC concept is based on the transfer of oxygen from the combustion air to fuel by means of an oxygen carrier in the form of a metal oxide. The system consists of two separate but interconnected reactors, normally fluidized-bed type. In the fuel reactor, the oxygen carrier particles react with fuel and generate a gas stream mainly composed of CO 2 and H 2 O. The reduced metal oxide is later transported to the air reactor, where oxygen from the air is transferred to the particles; in this way, one can obtain the original metal oxide ready to be returned to the fuel reactor for a new cycle. In this work, a 10 kW th pilot plant that is composed of two interconnected bubbling fluidized-bed reactors has been designed and built to demonstrate the CLC technology. The prototype was operated for 200 h, 120 h of which involved the burning of methane. The effect of the operating conditions (oxygen carrier-to-fuel ratio, fuel gas velocity, oxygen carrier particle size, and fuel reactor temperature) on fuel conversion was analyzed working with a CuO−Al 2 O 3 oxygen carrier prepared by dry impregnation. In addition, the behavior with respect to attrition, agglomeration, and reactivity of the oxygen carrier was analyzed. It was found that the most important parameter that was affecting the CH 4 conversion was the oxygen carrier-to-fuel ratio. Complete methane conversion, without CO or H 2 emissions, was obtained with this oxygen carrier working at 800 °C and oxygen carrier-to-fuel ratios of >1.4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels
Mattisson, T., Lyngfelt, A., & Leion, H. (2009) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.002 · Cited by 631
Abad, A., Adánez-Rubio, I., Gayán, P., García-Labiano, F., de Diego, L. F., & Adánez, J. (2012) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.10.016 · Cited by 262
Self-citationDevelopment trends in porous adsorbents for carbon capture
Sreenivasulu, B., Sreedhar, I., Suresh, P., & Raghavan, K. V. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03149 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Adánez, J., Gayán, P., Celaya, J., de Diego, L. F., García-Labiano, F., & Abad, A.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-07-18
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6075-6080
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2055510288
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Looping Combustion in a 10 kWth Prototype Using a CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carrier: Effect of Operating Conditions on Methane Combustion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie060364l
- The paper
- Adánez, J., Gayán, P., Celaya, J., de Diego, L. F., García-Labiano, F., & Abad, A. (2006). Chemical Looping Combustion in a 10 kWth Prototype Using a CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carrier: Effect of Operating Conditions on Methane Combustion. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060364l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.