Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experimental Validation of the Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process with Two Circulating Fluidized Bed Carbonator Reactors

Charitos, Alexander, Rodríguez, Nuria, Hawthorne, Craig, Alonso, Mónica, Zieba, Mariusz, Arias, Borja, Kopanakis, Georgios, Scheffknecht, Günter, Abanades, Juan Carlos·2011·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Postcombustion CO 2 capture using CaO as a regenerable solid sorbent in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) carbonator is emerging as a promising CO 2 capture technology. Experimental validation of this concept is provided through a comparative analysis of the results obtained in two laboratory-scale dual fluidized bed (DFB) installations located at INCAR-CSIC (Spain) and IFK (Germany). The analysis is focused on the performance of the CFB carbonator reactors operated with continuous solid circulation of CaO. A reasonable closure of the carbon balances (i) between the CO 2 that has disappeared from the gas phase, (ii) the CaCO 3 circulating between the reactors, and (iii) the CaCO 3 that is formed within the carbonator bed has been established. A necessary condition for the capture of a given molar flow of CO 2 is experimentally demonstrated and requires that a slightly overstoichiometric molar flow of active CaO is supplied to the carbonator. The deactivation behavior of the sorbents during continuous looping conditions has been measured. The key parameter to interpret the carbonator reactor results has been the active space time, that is indicative of the CaO inventory per molar flow of CO 2 participating in the carbonation reaction and of the reaction rate of the solid inventory in the reactor. Two different approaches have been utilized in order to find a suitable expression for this parameter, thus achieving its correlation with the CO 2 capture efficiency. A simple model assuming instant mixing of solids and plug-flow of the gas has been tested. Based mainly on carbonator active space time variation, the CO 2 capture efficiency are shown to lie between 30% and above 90%. These results confirm the technical viability of the calcium looping postcombustion CO 2 capture process. They have been used for designing the current pilot-plant facilities which are scaled up 20–50 times in regard to the lab-scale units. Moreover, the lab-scale results obtained allow for simulation work to be initiated in regard to the full scale Ca looping application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie200579f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Charitos, A., Rodríguez, N., Hawthorne, C., Alonso, M., Zieba, M., Arias, B., Kopanakis, G., Scheffknecht, G., & Abanades, J. C.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2011-07-14
Volume
50
Issue
16
Pages
9685-9695
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2074259378
Cited by
171
References
0
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Validation of the Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process with Two Circulating Fluidized Bed Carbonator Reactors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie200579f
The paper
Charitos, A., Rodríguez, N., Hawthorne, C., Alonso, M., Zieba, M., Arias, B., Kopanakis, G., Scheffknecht, G., & Abanades, J. C. (2011). Experimental Validation of the Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process with Two Circulating Fluidized Bed Carbonator Reactors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200579f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.