Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fluoride Removal from Water using Bio-Char, a Green Waste, Low-Cost Adsorbent: Equilibrium Uptake and Sorption Dynamics Modeling

Mohan, Dinesh, Sharma, Rupa, Singh, Vinod K., Steele, Philip, Pittman, Charles U.·2012·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Drinking water containing fluoride >1 mg/L is unsafe for human consumption. Higher intake of fluoride can cause potential health hazards. Low-cost pine wood and pine bark chars, obtained as a byproduct from fast pyrolysis in an auger reactor at 400 and 450 °C, were characterized and used as received for water defluoridation. Sorption studies were performed at different temperatures, pH values, and solid to liquid ratios in the batch mode. Maximum fluoride adsorption occurred at pH 2.0. A kinetic study yielded an optimum equilibrium time of 48 h with an adsorbent dose of 10 g/L. Sorption isotherm studies were conducted over a concentration range of 1–100 mg/L. Fluoride adsorption decreased with an increase in temperature. The char performances were evaluated using the Freundlich, Langmuir, Redlich–Peterson, Toth, Temkin, Sips, and Radke adsorption models. Based on average percent error, the best isotherm fits follow the orders for pine wood and pine bark: PW Langmuir ≈ PW Redlich-Peterson > PW Toth > PW Sips > PW Radke-Prausnitz ≈ PW Freundlich > PW Temkin and PB Toth > PB Radke-Prausnitz ≈ PB Freundlich > PB Redlich-Peterson > PB Langmuir > PB Sips > PB Temkin . The pine chars successfully treated fluoride-contaminated groundwater at pH 2.0. The chars swelled in water due to their high oxygen content (8–11%), opening new internal pore volume. Fluoride could also diffuse into portions of the chars’ subsurface solid volume promoting further adsorption. Ion exchange and metal fluoride precipitation are modes of adsorption. Remarkably, these chars ( S BET: 1–3 m 2 g –1 ) can remove similar amounts or more fluoride than activated carbon ( S BET: ∼1000 m 2 g –1 ).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie202189v

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Mohan, D., Sharma, R., Singh, V. K., Steele, P., & Pittman, C. U.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2012-01-06
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
900-914
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2320740915
Cited by
257
References
2
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluoride Removal from Water using Bio-Char, a Green Waste, Low-Cost Adsorbent: Equilibrium Uptake and Sorption Dynamics Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie202189v
The paper
Mohan, D., Sharma, R., Singh, V. K., Steele, P., & Pittman, C. U. (2012). Fluoride Removal from Water using Bio-Char, a Green Waste, Low-Cost Adsorbent: Equilibrium Uptake and Sorption Dynamics Modeling. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202189v

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.