Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guide to CO2 Separations in Imidazolium-Based Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids

Bara, Jason E., Carlisle, Trevor K., Gabriel, Christopher J., Camper, Dean, Finotello, Alexia, Gin, Douglas L., Noble, Richard D.·2009·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are nonvolatile, tunable solvents that have generated significant interest across a wide variety of engineering applications. The use of RTILs as media for CO 2 separations appears especially promising, with imidazolium-based salts at the center of this research effort. The solubilities of gases, particularly CO 2, N 2, and CH 4, have been studied in a number of RTILs. Process temperature and the chemical structures of the cation and anion have significant impacts on gas solubility and gas pair selectivity. Models based on regular solution theory and group contributions are useful to predict and explain CO 2 solubility and selectivity in imidazolium-based RTILs. In addition to their role as a physical solvent, RTILs might also be used in supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) as a highly permeable and selective transport medium. Performance data for SILMs indicates that they exhibit large permeabilities as well as CO 2 /N 2 selectivities that outperform many polymer membranes. Furthermore, the greatest potential of RTILs for CO 2 separations might lie in their ability to chemically capture CO 2 when used in combination with amines. Amines can be tethered to the cation or the anion, or dissolved in RTILs, providing a wide range of chemical solvents for CO 2 capture. However, despite all of their promising features, RTILs do have drawbacks to use in CO 2 separations, which have been overlooked as appropriate comparisons of RTILs to common organic solvents and polymers have not been reported. A thorough summary of the capabilities—and limitations—of imidazolium-based RTILs in CO 2 -based separations with respect to a variety of materials is thus provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie8016237

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Bara, J. E., Carlisle, T. K., Gabriel, C. J., Camper, D., Finotello, A., Gin, D. L., & Noble, R. D.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2009-02-11
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
2739-2751
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2163318415
Cited by
714
References
2
FWCI
22.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guide to CO2 Separations in Imidazolium-Based Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie8016237
The paper
Bara, J. E., Carlisle, T. K., Gabriel, C. J., Camper, D., Finotello, A., Gin, D. L., & Noble, R. D. (2009). Guide to CO2 Separations in Imidazolium-Based Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8016237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.