The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A laser photolysis study of the reaction of sulfate(1-) with chloride and the subsequent decay of chlorine(1-) in aqueous solution
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTA laser photolysis study of the reaction of sulfate(1-) with chloride and the subsequent decay of chlorine(1-) in aqueous solutionW. John. McElroyCite this: J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6, 2435–2441Publication Date (Print):March 1, 1990Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 March 1990https://doi.org/10.1021/j100369a044RIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views543Altmetric-Citations184LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (880 KB) Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059 · Cited by 4,087
Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: A review
Wacławek, S., Lutze, H. V., Grübel, K., Padil, V. V. T., Černík, M., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.132 · Cited by 1,874
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Lutze, H. V., Kerlin, N., & Schmidt, T. C. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.006 · Cited by 521
Degradation of chloramphenicol by thermally activated persulfate in aqueous solution
Nie, M., Yang, Y., Zhang, Z., Yan, C., Wang, X., Li, H., & Dong, W. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.047 · Cited by 469
Degradation of acetic acid with sulfate radical generated by persulfate ions photolysis
Criquet, J., & Leitner, N. K. V. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.040 · Cited by 332
Physico-Chemical Processes for the Treatment of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A review
Nzeribe, B. N., Crimi, M., Mededovic Thagard, S., & Holsen, T. M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1542916 · Cited by 314
Efficient removal of endosulfan from aqueous solution by UV-C/peroxides: A comparative study
Shah, N. S., He, X., Khan, H. M., Khan, J. A., O'Shea, K. E., Boccelli, D. L., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2013) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.019 · Cited by 260
Das, T. N. (2001) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp011255h · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- McElroy, W. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2435-2441
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W314323317
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
