Cited by 22Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materialsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAdsorption and Cooling Systems

An example of desorption hysteresis at low relative pressures on a non-porous adsorbent: Ammonia on graphitized carbon black

Holmes, James M., Beebe, Ralph A.·1957·The Journal of Physical Chemistry

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTAn Example of Desorption Hysteresis at Low Relative Pressures on a Non-porous Adsorbent: Ammonia on Graphitized Carbon BlackJames M. Holmes and Ralph A. BeebeCite this: J. Phys. Chem. 1957, 61, 12, 1684–1686Publication Date (Print):December 1, 1957Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 December 1957https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/j150558a040https://doi.org/10.1021/j150558a040research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views102Altmetric-Citations19LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access options Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/j150558a040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adsorption of NH3 onto black carbon has been previously recognized.

    “Adsorption of NH3 onto black carbon (defined as thermal-chemical by-products, encompassing graphite's to biochars [85] has been previously recognized [86].”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [86]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmes, J. M., & Beebe, R. A.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
Published
1957-12
Volume
61
Issue
12
Pages
1684-1686
ISSN
  • 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-5740
OpenAlex
W2014859441
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
desorption hysteresis, ammonia adsorption, graphitized carbon black, adsorption isotherms, adsorption-desorption equilibrium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review