The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Τhe β-Peptide Hairpin in Solution: Conformational Study of a β-Hexapeptide in Methanol by NMR Spectroscopy and MD Simulation
Open accessAbstract
The structural and thermodynamic properties of a 6-residue beta-peptide that was designed to form a hairpin conformation have been studied by NMR spectroscopy and MD simulation in methanol solution. The predicted hairpin would be characterized by a 10-membered hydrogen-bonded turn involving residues 3 and 4, and two extended antiparallel strands. The interproton distances and backbone torsional dihedral angles derived from the NMR experiments at room temperature are in general terms compatible with the hairpin conformation. Two trajectories of system configurations from 100-ns molecular-dynamics simulations of the peptide in solution at 298 and 340 K have been analyzed. In both simulations reversible folding to the hairpin conformation is observed. Interestingly, there is a significant conformational overlap between the unfolded state of the peptide at each of the temperatures. As already observed in previous studies of peptide folding, the unfolded state is composed of a (relatively) small number of predominant conformers and in this case lacks any type of secondary-structure element. The trajectories provide an excellent ground for the interpretation of the NMR-derived data in terms of ensemble averages and distributions as opposed to single-conformation interpretations. From this perspective, a relative population of the hairpin conformation of 20% to 30% would suffice to explain the NMR-derived data. Surprisingly, however, the ensemble of structures from the simulation at 340 K reproduces more accurately the NMR-derived data than the ensemble from the simulation at 298 K, a question that needs further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel.
Onuchic, J. N., Wolynes, P. G., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Socci, N. D. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.8.3626 · Cited by 523
Cited by
Seebach, D., & Gardiner, J. (2008) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar700263g · Cited by 709
Self-citationBiomolecular Modeling: Goals, Problems, Perspectives
van Gunsteren, W. F., Bakowies, D., Baron, R., Chandrasekhar, I., Christen, M., Daura, X., Gee, P., Geerke, D. P., Glättli, A., Hünenberger, P. H., et al. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200502655 · Cited by 561
Self-citationUnderstanding folding and design: Replica-exchange simulations of ``Trp-cage'' miniproteins
Pitera, J. W., & Swope, W. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1330954100 · Cited by 344
Vasudev, P. G., Chatterjee, S., Shamala, N., & Balaram, P. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100100x · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Daura, X., Gademann, K., Schäfer, H., Jaun, B., Seebach, D., & van Gunsteren, W. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-02-16
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2393-2404
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1991877201
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.