Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selected ion fragmentation with a tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer

Yost, R. A., Enke, C. G.·1978·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer is used to create ion species from a sample, separate one individual ion species, fragment it, and obtain the mass spectrum of the fragments. Practicability of the Selected Ion Fragmentation Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (SIFT QMS) is experimentally demonstrated. Normally large ion losses due to scattering in the collision-induced dissociation (CID) process are eliminated by performing CID in a 'RF-only' quadrupole. CID spectra with unit mass resolution are produced by the quadrupole mass filters. The CID spectrum of each component of a cyclohexane mixture containing three minor components is presented. Potential applications of SIFT QMS in mixture analysis and structure elucidation are discussed. (Author)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja00475a072

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yost, R. A., & Enke, C. G.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1978-03
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
2274-2275
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2034541601
Cited by
359
References
0
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.