The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate p KaCalculations for Carboxylic Acids Using Complete Basis Set and Gaussian-n Models Combined with CPCM Continuum Solvation Methods
Abstract
Complete Basis Set and Gaussian-n methods were combined with CPCM continuum solvation methods to calculate pK(a) values for six carboxylic acids. An experimental value of -264.61 kcal/mol for the free energy of solvation of H(+), DeltaG(s)(H(+)), was combined with a value for G(gas)(H(+)) of -6.28 kcal/mol to calculate pK(a) values with Cycle 1. The Complete Basis Set gas-phase methods used to calculate gas-phase free energies are very accurate, with mean unsigned errors of 0.3 kcal/mol and standard deviations of 0.4 kcal/mol. The CPCM solvation calculations used to calculate condensed-phase free energies are slightly less accurate than the gas-phase models, and the best method has a mean unsigned error and standard deviation of 0.4 and 0.5 kcal/mol, respectively. The use of Cycle 1 and the Complete Basis Set models combined with the CPCM solvation methods yielded pK(a) values accurate to less than half a pK(a) unit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the structure and thermodynamics of solvated monoatomic ions using a hybrid solvation model
Topol, I. A., Tawa, G. J., Burt, S. K., & Rashin, A. A. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.480486 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Sulpizi, M., Gaigeot, M.-P., & Sprik, M. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct2007154 · Cited by 466
Basicity of Nucleophilic Carbenes in Aqueous and Nonaqueous SolventsTheoretical Predictions
Magill, A. M., Cavell, K. J., & Yates, B. F. (2004) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja038973x · Cited by 451
Kelly, C. P., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp055336f · Cited by 445
Klamt, A., Eckert, F., Diedenhofen, M., & Beck, M. E. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp034688o · Cited by 287
De Meyer, T., Hemelsoet, K., Van Speybroeck, V., & De Clerck, K. (2014) · Dyes and Pigments · doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.048 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Liptak, M. D., & Shields, G. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-07-07
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 7314-7319
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2133627924
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.