Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Top Down Characterization of Larger Proteins (45 kDa) by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry

Ge, Ying, Lawhorn, Brian G., ElNaggar, Mariam, Strauss, Erick, Park, Joo-Heon, Begley, Tadhg P., McLafferty, Fred W.·2002·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The structural characterization of proteins expressed from the genome is a major problem in proteomics. The solution to this problem requires the separation of the protein of interest from a complex mixture, the identification of its DNA-predicted sequence, and the characterization of sequencing errors and posttranslational modifications. For this, the "top down" mass spectrometry (MS) approach, extended by the greatly increased protein fragmentation from electron capture dissociation (ECD), has been applied to characterize proteins involved in the biosynthesis of thiamin, Coenzyme A, and the hydroxylation of proline residues in proteins. With Fourier transform (FT) MS, electrospray ionization (ESI) of a complex mixture from an E. coli cell extract gave 102 accurate molecular weight values (2-30 kDa), but none corresponding to the predicted masses of the four desired enzymes for thiamin biosynthesis (GoxB, ThiS, ThiG, and ThiF). MS/MS of one ion species (representing approximately 1% of the mixture) identified it with the DNA-predicted sequence of ThiS, although the predicted and measured molecular weights were different. Further purification yielded a 2-component mixture whose ECD spectrum characterized both proteins simultaneously as ThiS and ThiG, showing an additional N-terminal Met on the 8 kDa ThiS and removal of an N-terminal Met and Ser from the 27 kDa ThiG. For a second system, the molecular weight of the 45 kDa phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase/decarboxylase (CoaBC), an enzyme involved in Coenzyme A biosynthesis, was 131 Da lower than that of the DNA prediction; the ECD spectrum showed that this is due to the removal of the N-terminal Met. For a third system, viral prolyl 4-hydroxylase (26 kDa), ECD showed that multiple molecular ions (+98, +178, etc.) are due to phosphate noncovalent adducts, and MS/MS pinpointed the overall mass discrepancy of 135 Da to removal of the initiation Met (131 Da) and to formation of disulfide bonds (2 x 2 Da) at C32-C49 and C143-C147, although 10 S-S positions were possible. In contrast, "bottom up" proteolysis characterization of the CoaBC and the P4H proteins was relatively unsuccessful. The addition of ECD substantially increases the capabilities of top down FTMS for the detailed structural characterization of large proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja011335z

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Ge, Y., Lawhorn, B. G., ElNaggar, M., Strauss, E., Park, J.-H., Begley, T. P., & McLafferty, F. W.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
672-678
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2004558299
Cited by
353
References
0
FWCI
14.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top Down Characterization of Larger Proteins (45 kDa) by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja011335z
The paper
Ge, Y., Lawhorn, B. G., ElNaggar, M., Strauss, E., Park, J.-H., Begley, T. P., & McLafferty, F. W. (2002). Top Down Characterization of Larger Proteins (45 kDa) by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja011335z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.