Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3D TEDOR NMR Experiments for the Simultaneous Measurement of Multiple Carbon−Nitrogen Distances in Uniformly13C,15N-Labeled Solids

Jaroniec, Christopher P., Filip, Claudiu, Griffin, Robert G.·2002·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

We describe three-dimensional magic-angle-spinning NMR experiments for the simultaneous measurement of multiple carbon-nitrogen distances in uniformly (13)C,(15)N-labeled solids. The approaches employ transferred echo double resonance (TEDOR) for (13)C-(15)N coherence transfer and (15)N and (13)C frequency labeling for site-specific resolution, and build on several previous 3D TEDOR techniques. The novel feature of the 3D TEDOR pulse sequences presented here is that they are specifically designed to circumvent the detrimental effects of homonuclear (13)C-(13)C J-couplings on the measurement of weak (13)C-(15)N dipolar couplings. In particular, homonuclear J-couplings lead to two undesirable effects: (i) they generate anti-phase and multiple-quantum (MQ) spin coherences, which lead to spurious cross-peaks and phase-twisted lines in the 2D (15)N-(13)C correlation spectra, and thus degrade the spectral resolution and prohibit the extraction of reliable cross-peak intensities, and (ii) they significantly reduce cross-peak intensities for strongly J-coupled (13)C sites (e.g., CO and C(alpha)). The first experiment employs z-filter periods to suppress the anti-phase and MQ coherences and generates 2D spectra with purely absorptive peaks for all TEDOR mixing times. The second approach uses band-selective (13)C pulses to refocus J-couplings between (13)C spins within the selective pulse bandwidth and (13)C spins outside the bandwidth. The internuclear distances are extracted by using a simple analytical model, which accounts explicitly for multiple spin-spin couplings contributing to cross-peak buildup. The experiments are demonstrated in two U-(13)C,(15)N-labeled peptides, N-acetyl-L-Val-L-Leu (N-ac-VL) and N-formyl-L-Met-L-Leu-L-Phe (N-f-MLF), where 20 and 26 (13)C-(15)N distances up to approximately 5-6 A were measured, respectively. Of the measured distances, 10 in N-ac-VL and 13 in N-f-MLF are greater than 3 A and provide valuable structural constraints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja026385y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Jaroniec, C. P., Filip, C., & Griffin, R. G.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2002-08-15
Volume
124
Issue
36
Pages
10728-10742
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2100055535
Cited by
288
References
2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.