The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism of Ene Reactions of Singlet Oxygen. A Two-Step No-Intermediate Mechanism
Abstract
The mechanism of the ene reaction of singlet ((1)delta(g)) oxygen with simple alkenes is investigated by a combination of experimental isotope effects and several levels of theoretical calculations. For the reaction of 2,4-dimethyl-3-isopropyl-2-pentene, the olefinic carbons exhibit small and nearly equal (13)C isotope effects of 1.005-1.007, while the reacting methyl groups exhibit (13)C isotope effects near unity. In a novel experiment, the (13)C composition of the product is analyzed to determine the intramolecular (13)C isotope effects in the ene reaction of tetramethylethylene. The new (13)C and literature (2)H isotope effects are then used to evaluate the accuracy of theoretical calculations. RHF, CASSCF(10e, 8o), and restricted and unrestricted B3LYP calculations are each applied to the ene reaction with tetramethylethylene. Each predicts a different mechanism, but none leads to reasonable predictions of the experimental isotope effects. It is concluded that none of these calculations accurately describe the reaction. A more successful approach was to use high-level, up to CCSD(T), single-point energy calculations on a grid of B3LYP geometries. The resulting energy surface is supported by its accurate predictions of the intermolecular (13)C and (2)H isotope effects and a very good prediction of the reaction barrier. This CCSD(T)//B3LYP surface features two adjacent transition states without an intervening intermediate. This is the first experimentally supported example of such a surface and the first example of a valley-ridge inflection with significant chemical consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calculation of Equilibrium Constants for Isotopic Exchange Reactions
Bigeleisen, J., & Mayer, M. G. (1947) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1746492 · Cited by 1,893
Cited by
Singlet Molecular Oxygen Reactions with Nucleic Acids, Lipids, and Proteins
Di Mascio, P., Martinez, G. R., Miyamoto, S., Ronsein, G. E., Medeiros, M. H. G., & Cadet, J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00554 · Cited by 659
Lu, Y., & Larock, R. C. (2009) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.200800241 · Cited by 324
Concepts and Principles of Photodynamic Therapy as an Alternative Antifungal Discovery Platform
Dai, T., Fuchs, B. B., Coleman, J. J., Prates, R. A., Astrakas, C., St. Denis, T. G., Ribeiro, M. S., Mylonakis, E., Hamblin, M. R., & Tegos, G. P. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00120 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Singleton, D. A., Hang, C., Szymanski, M. J., Meyer, M. P., Leach, A. G., Kuwata, K. T., Chen, J. S., Greer, A., Foote, C. S., & Houk, K. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-01-14
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1319-1328
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1973963845
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.