Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concepts and Principles of Photodynamic Therapy as an Alternative Antifungal Discovery Platform

Open access
Dai, Tianhong, Fuchs, Beth B., Coleman, Jeffrey J., Prates, Renato A., Astrakas, Christos, St. Denis, Tyler G., Ribeiro, Martha S., Mylonakis, Eleftherios, Hamblin, Michael R., Tegos, George P.·2012·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Opportunistic fungal pathogens may cause superficial or serious invasive infections, especially in immunocompromised and debilitated patients. Invasive mycoses represent an exponentially growing threat for human health due to a combination of slow diagnosis and the existence of relatively few classes of available and effective antifungal drugs. Therefore systemic fungal infections result in high attributable mortality. There is an urgent need to pursue and deploy novel and effective alternative antifungal countermeasures. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was established as a successful modality for malignancies and age-related macular degeneration but photodynamic inactivation has only recently been intensively investigated as an alternative antimicrobial discovery and development platform. The concept of photodynamic inactivation requires microbial exposure to either exogenous or endogenous photosensitizer molecules, followed by visible light energy, typically wavelengths in the red/near infrared region that cause the excitation of the photosensitizers resulting in the production of singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species that react with intracellular components, and consequently produce cell inactivation and death. Antifungal PDT is an area of increasing interest, as research is advancing (i) to identify the photochemical and photophysical mechanisms involved in photoinactivation; (ii) to develop potent and clinically compatible photosensitizers; (iii) to understand how photoinactivation is affected by key microbial phenotypic elements multidrug resistance and efflux, virulence and pathogenesis determinants, and formation of biofilms; (iv) to explore novel photosensitizer delivery platforms; and (v) to identify photoinactivation applications beyond the clinical setting such as environmental disinfectants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00120

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Dai, T., Fuchs, B. B., Coleman, J. J., Prates, R. A., Astrakas, C., St. Denis, T. G., Ribeiro, M. S., Mylonakis, E., Hamblin, M. R., & Tegos, G. P.
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2012
Volume
3
Pages
120-120
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155908385
Cited by
295
References
131
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concepts and Principles of Photodynamic Therapy as an Alternative Antifungal Discovery Platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00120
The paper
Dai, T., Fuchs, B. B., Coleman, J. J., Prates, R. A., Astrakas, C., St. Denis, T. G., Ribeiro, M. S., Mylonakis, E., Hamblin, M. R., & Tegos, G. P. (2012). Concepts and Principles of Photodynamic Therapy as an Alternative Antifungal Discovery Platform. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.