Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MLCT State Structure and Dynamics of a Copper(I) Diimine Complex Characterized by Pump−Probe X-ray and Laser Spectroscopies and DFT Calculations

Chen, Lin X., Shaw, George B., Novozhilova, Irina, Liu, Tao, Jennings, Guy, Attenkofer, Klaus, Meyer, Gerald J., Coppens, Philip·2003·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The molecular structure and dynamics of the photoexcited metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (MLCT) state of [Cu(I)(dmp)(2)](+), where dmp is 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, in acetonitrile have been investigated by time-domain pump-probe X-ray absorption spectroscopy, femtosecond optical transient spectroscopy, and density functional theory (DFT). The time resolution for the excited state structural determination was 100 ps, provided by single X-ray pulses from a third generation synchrotron source. The copper ion in the thermally equilibrated MLCT state has the same oxidation state as the corresponding copper(II) complex in the ground state and was found to be penta-coordinate with an average nearest neighbor Cu-N distance 0.04 A shorter than that of the ground state [Cu(I)(dmp)(2)](+). The results confirm the previously proposed "exciplex" structure of the MLCT state in Lewis basic solvents. The evolution from the photoexcited Franck-Condon MLCT state to the thermally equilibrated MLCT state was followed by femtosecond optical transient spectroscopy, revealing three time constants of 500-700 fs, 10-20 ps, and 1.6-1.7 ns, likely related to the kinetics for the formation of the triplet MLCT state, structural relaxation, and the MLCT excited-state decay to the ground state, respectively. DFT calculations are used to interpret the spectral shift on structural relaxation and to predict the geometries of the ground state, the tetracoordinate excited state, and the exciplex. The DFT calculations also indicate that the amount of charge transferred from copper to the dmp ligand upon photoexcitation is similar to the charge difference at the copper center between the ground-state copper(I) and copper(II) complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja0294663

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L. X., Shaw, G. B., Novozhilova, I., Liu, T., Jennings, G., Attenkofer, K., Meyer, G. J., & Coppens, P.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2003-05-17
Volume
125
Issue
23
Pages
7022-7034
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2104148174
Cited by
345
References
2
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MLCT State Structure and Dynamics of a Copper(I) Diimine Complex Characterized by Pump−Probe X-ray and Laser Spectroscopies and DFT Calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0294663
The paper
Chen, L. X., Shaw, G. B., Novozhilova, I., Liu, T., Jennings, G., Attenkofer, K., Meyer, G. J., & Coppens, P. (2003). MLCT State Structure and Dynamics of a Copper(I) Diimine Complex Characterized by Pump−Probe X-ray and Laser Spectroscopies and DFT Calculations. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0294663

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.