Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Backbone Proton Positions and Dynamics in a Small Protein by Liquid Crystal NMR Spectroscopy

Ulmer, Tobias S., Ramirez, Benjamin E., Delaglio, Frank, Bax, Ad·2003·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

NMR measurements of a large set of protein backbone one-bond dipolar couplings have been carried out to refine the structure of the third IgG-binding domain of Protein G (GB3), previously solved by X-ray crystallography at a resolution of 1.1 A. Besides the commonly used bicelle, poly(ethylene glycol), and filamentous phage liquid crystalline media, dipolar couplings were also measured when the protein was aligned inside either positively or negatively charged stretched acrylamide gels. Refinement of the GB3 crystal structure against the (13)C(alpha)-(13)C' and (13)C'-(15)N dipolar couplings improves the agreement between experimental and predicted (15)N-(1)H(N) as well as (13)C(alpha)-(1)H(alpha) dipolar couplings. Evaluation of the peptide bond N-H orientations shows a weak anticorrelation between the deviation of the peptide bond torsion angle omega from 180 degrees and the angle between the N-H vector and the C'-N-C(alpha) plane. The slope of this correlation is -1, indicating that, on average, pyramidalization of the peptide N contributes to small deviations from peptide bond planarity ( = 179.3 +/- 3.1 degrees ) to the same degree as true twisting around the C'-N bond. Although hydrogens are commonly built onto crystal structures assuming the N-H vector orientation falls on the line bisecting the C'-N-C(alpha) angle, a better approximation adjusts the C(alpha)-C'-N-H torsion angle to -2 degrees. The (15)N-(1)H(N) dipolar data do not contradict the commonly accepted motional model where angular fluctuations of the N-H bond orthogonal to the peptide plane are larger than in-plane motions, but the amplitude of angular fluctuations orthogonal the C(alpha)(i-1)-N(i)-C(alpha)(i) plane exceeds that of in-plane motions by at most 10-15 degrees. Dipolar coupling analysis indicates that for most of the GB3 backbone, the amide order parameters, S, are highly homogeneous and vary by less than +/-7%. Evaluation of the H(alpha) proton positions indicates that the average C(alpha)-H(alpha) vector orientation deviates by less than 1 degrees from the direction that makes ideal tetrahedral angles with the C(alpha)-C(beta) and C(alpha)-N vectors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja0350684

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Ulmer, T. S., Ramirez, B. E., Delaglio, F., & Bax, A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
125
Issue
30
Pages
9179-9191
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2070189028
Cited by
301
References
1
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Backbone Proton Positions and Dynamics in a Small Protein by Liquid Crystal NMR Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0350684
The paper
Ulmer, T. S., Ramirez, B. E., Delaglio, F., & Bax, A. (2003). Evaluation of Backbone Proton Positions and Dynamics in a Small Protein by Liquid Crystal NMR Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0350684

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.