Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partitioning the Loss in Vancomycin Binding Affinity for d -Ala- d -Lac into Lost H-Bond and Repulsive Lone Pair Contributions

McComas, Casey C., Crowley, Brendan M., Boger, Dale L.·2003·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The binding affinity of 4, which incorporates a methylene (CH2) in place of the key linking amide of Ac2-l-Lys-d-Ala-d-Ala, for vancomycin was compared with that of Ac2-l-Lys-d-Ala-d-Ala (3) and Ac2-l-Lys-d-Ala-d-Lac (5). The vancomycin affinity for 4 was approximately 10-fold less than that of 3, but 100-fold greater than that of 5. This suggests that the reduced binding affinity of 5 (4.1 kcal/mol) may be attributed to both the loss of a key H-bond (1.5 kcal/mol) and a destabilizing lone pair/lone pair electrostatic interaction introduced with the ester oxygen of 5 (2.6 kcal/mol) with the latter, not the H-bond, being responsible for the largest share of the 1000-fold reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja035901x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McComas, C. C., Crowley, B. M., & Boger, D. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2003-07-11
Volume
125
Issue
31
Pages
9314-9315
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2052147832
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.