The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditional Protein Splicing: A New Tool to Control Protein Structure and Function in Vitro and in Vivo
Abstract
Protein splicing is a naturally occurring process in which an intervening intein domain excises itself out of a precursor polypeptide in an autocatalytic fashion with concomitant linkage of the two flanking extein sequences by a native peptide bond. We have recently reported an engineered split VMA intein whose splicing activity in trans between two polypeptides can be triggered by the small molecule rapamycin. In this report, we show that this conditional protein splicing (CPS) system can be used in mammalian cells. Two model constructs harboring maltose-binding protein (MBP) and a His-tag as exteins were expressed from a constitutive promoter after transient transfection. The splicing product MBP-His was detected by Western blotting and immunoprecipitation in cells treated with rapamycin or a nontoxic analogue thereof. No background splicing in the absence of the small-molecule inducer was observed over a 24-h time course. Product formation could be detected within 10 min of addition of rapamycin, indicating the advantage of the posttranslational nature of CPS for quick responses. The level of protein splicing was dose dependent and could be competitively attenuated with the small molecule ascomycin. In related studies, the geometric flexibility of the CPS components was investigated with a series of purified proteins. The FKBP and FRB domains, which are dimerized by rapamycin and thereby induce the reconstitution of the split intein, were fused to the extein sequences of the split intein halves. CPS was still triggered by rapamycin when FKBP and FRB occupied one or both of the extein positions. This finding suggests yet further applications of CPS in the area of proteomics. In summary, CPS holds great promise to become a powerful new tool to control protein structure and function in vitro and in living cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.
Gossen, M., & Bujard, H. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547 · Cited by 4,943
Cited by
Chemically induced proximity in biology and medicine
Stanton, B. Z., Chory, E. J., & Crabtree, G. R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao5902 · Cited by 475
Inteins: nature's gift to protein chemists
Shah, N. H., & Muir, T. W. (2014) · Chem. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3sc52951g · Cited by 404
Self-citationChemically Controlled Protein Assembly: Techniques and Applications
Fegan, A., White, B., Carlson, J. C. T., & Wagner, C. R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr8002888 · Cited by 294
Synthetic biology in mammalian cells: next generation research tools and therapeutics
Lienert, F., Lohmueller, J. J., Garg, A., & Silver, P. A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3738 · Cited by 280
FKBP Ligands—Where We Are and Where to Go?
Kolos, J. M., Voll, A. M., Bauder, M., & Hausch, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01425 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Mootz, H. D., Blum, E. S., Tyszkiewicz, A. B., & Muir, T. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-08-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 10561-10569
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1990952318
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conditional Protein Splicing: A New Tool to Control Protein Structure and Function in Vitro and in Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0362813
- The paper
- Mootz, H. D., Blum, E. S., Tyszkiewicz, A. B., & Muir, T. W. (2003). Conditional Protein Splicing: A New Tool to Control Protein Structure and Function in Vitro and in Vivo. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0362813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.