The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NMR R1ρ Rotating-Frame Relaxation with Weak Radio Frequency Fields
Abstract
NMR spin relaxation in the rotating frame (R(1 rho)) is one of few methods available to characterize chemical exchange kinetic processes occurring on micros-ms time scales. R(1 rho) measurements for heteronuclei in biological macromolecules generally require decoupling of (1)H scalar coupling interactions and suppression of cross-relaxation processes. Korzhnev and co-workers demonstrated that applying conventional (1)H decoupling schemes while the heteronuclei are spin-locked by a radio frequency (rf) field results in imperfect decoupling [Korzhnev, Skrynnikov, Millet, Torchia, Kay. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10743-10753]. Experimental NMR pulse sequences were presented that provide accurate measurements of R(1 rho) rate constants for radio frequency field strengths > 1000 Hz. This paper presents new two-dimensional NMR experiments that allow the use of weak rf fields, between 150 and 1000 Hz, in R(1 rho) experiments. Fourier decomposition and average Hamiltonian theory are employed to analyze the spin-lock sequence and provide a guide for the development of improved experiments. The new pulse sequences are validated using ubiquitin and basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). The use of weak spin-lock fields in R(1 rho) experiments allows the study of the chemical exchange process on a wider range of time scales, bridging the gap that currently exists between Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill and conventional R(1 rho) experiments. The new experiments also extend the capability of the R(1 rho) technique to study exchange processes outside the fast exchange limit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An NMR Perspective on Enzyme Dynamics
Boehr, D. D., Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050312q · Cited by 458
Visualizing transient Watson–Crick-like mispairs in DNA and RNA duplexes
Kimsey, I. J., Petzold, K., Sathyamoorthy, B., Stein, Z. W., & Al-Hashimi, H. M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14227 · Cited by 261
Brath, U., Akke, M., Yang, D., Kay, L. E., & Mulder, F. A. A. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570279 · Cited by 57
Brath, U., & Akke, M. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.047 · Cited by 36
Protein-inhibitor interaction studies using NMR
Ishima, R. (2015) · Applications of NMR Spectroscopy · doi:10.2174/9781608059621115010007 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Massi, F., Johnson, E., Wang, C., Rance, M., & Palmer, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-29
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2247-2256
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1974207257
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NMR R1ρ Rotating-Frame Relaxation with Weak Radio Frequency Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja038721w
- The paper
- Massi, F., Johnson, E., Wang, C., Rance, M., & Palmer, A. G. (2004). NMR R1ρ Rotating-Frame Relaxation with Weak Radio Frequency Fields. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja038721w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.