The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural and Thermodynamic Studies on Cation−Π Interactions in Lectin−Ligand Complexes: High-Affinity Galectin-3 Inhibitors through Fine-Tuning of an Arginine−Arene Interaction
Abstract
The high-resolution X-ray crystal structures of the carbohydrate recognition domain of human galectin-3 were solved in complex with N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) and the high-affinity inhibitor, methyl 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-4-O-(3-deoxy-3-[4-methoxy-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzamido]-beta-D-galactopyranose)-beta-D-glucopyranoside, to gain insight into the basis for the affinity-enhancing effect of the 4-methoxy-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzamido moiety. The structures show that the side chain of Arg144 stacks against the aromatic moiety of the inhibitor, an interaction made possible by a reorientation of the side chain relative to that seen in the LacNAc complex. Based on these structures, synthesis of second generation LacNAc derivatives carrying aromatic amides at 3'-C, followed by screening with a novel fluorescence polarization assay, has led to the identification of inhibitors with further enhanced affinity for galectin-3 (K(d) > or = 320 nM). The thermodynamic parameters describing the binding of the galectin-3 C-terminal to selected inhibitors were determined by isothermal titration calorimetry and showed that the affinity enhancements were due to favorable enthalpic contributions. These enhancements could be rationalized by the combined effects of the inhibitor aromatic structure on a cation-Pi interaction and of direct interactions between the aromatic substituents and the protein. The results demonstrate that protein-ligand interactions can be significantly enhanced by the fine-tuning of arginine-arene interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of Cytokine Receptors by Golgi N-Glycan Processing and Endocytosis
Partridge, E. A., Le Roy, C., Di Guglielmo, G. M., Pawling, J., Cheung, P., Granovsky, M., Nabi, I. R., Wrana, J. L., & Dennis, J. W. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102109 · Cited by 735
Cited by
A Medicinal Chemist’s Guide to Molecular Interactions
Bissantz, C., Kuhn, B., & Stahl, M. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100112j · Cited by 1,731
Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M., & Diederich, F. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201007560 · Cited by 1,539
Glycomimetics versus Multivalent Glycoconjugates for the Design of High Affinity Lectin Ligands
Cecioni, S., Imberty, A., & Vidal, S. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500303t · Cited by 544
Biological applications of functionalized calixarenes
Nimse, S. B., & Kim, T. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35233h · Cited by 435
Boza-Serrano, A., Ruiz, R., Sanchez-Varo, R., García-Revilla, J., Yang, Y., Jimenez-Ferrer, I., Paulus, A., Wennström, M., Vilalta, A., Allendorf, D., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-019-02013-z · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sörme, P., Arnoux, P., Kahl-Knutsson, B., Leffler, H., Rini, J. M., & Nilsson, U. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-01-21
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1737-1743
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1966077354
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.