The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does Core Size Matter in the Kinetics of Ligand Exchanges of Monolayer-Protected Au Clusters?
Abstract
This paper compares the kinetics of exchanges of phenylethanethiolate ligands (PhC2S-) of the monolayer-protected clusters (MPCs) Au(38)(SC2Ph)(24) and Au(140)(SC2Ph)(53) with p-substituted arylthiols (p-X-PhSH), where X = NO(2), Br, CH(3), OCH(3), and OH. First-order rate constants at 293 K for exchange of the first ca. 25% of the ligands on the molecule-like Au(38)(SC2Ph)(24) MPC, measured using (1)H NMR, vary linearly with the in-coming arythiol concentration; ligand exchange is an overall second-order reaction. Remarkably, the second-order rate constants for ligand exchange on Au(38)(SC2Ph)(24) are very close to those of corresponding exchange reactions on the larger nanoparticle Au(140)(SC2Ph)(53) MPCs. These are the first results that quantitatively show that the chemical reactivity of different sized nanocrystals is almost independent of size; presumably, this is because the locus of the initial ligand exchanges is a common kind of site, thought to be the nanocrystal vertexes. The rates of later stages of exchange (beyond ca. 25%) differ for Au(38) and Au(140) cores, the latter being much slower presumably due to its larger terrace-like surface atom content. The reverse exchange reaction was studied for Au(38)(p-X-arylthiolate)(24) MPCs (X = NO(2), Br, and CH(3)), where the in-coming ligand is now phenylethanethiol. Remarkably, the rate constants of both forward and reverse exchanges display identical substituent effects, which implies a concurrent bonding of both in-coming and leaving ligands to the Au core in the rate-determining step, as in an associative mechanism. X = NO(2) gives the fastest rates, and the ratio of forward and reverse rate constants gives an equilibrium constant of K(EQ,PE) = 4.0 that is independent of X.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Story of a Monodisperse Gold Nanoparticle: Au25L18
Parker, J. F., Fields-Zinna, C. A., & Murray, R. W. (2010) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar100048c · Cited by 503
Self-citationTransformation Chemistry of Gold Nanoclusters: From One Stable Size to Another
Zeng, C., Chen, Y., Das, A., & Jin, R. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01150 · Cited by 258
Assessment of the biocompatibility and stability of a gold nanoparticle collagen bioscaffold
Grant, S. A., Spradling, C. S., Grant, D. N., Fox, D. B., Jimenez, L., Grant, D. A., & Rone, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34698 · Cited by 81
Singh, S., Dev, A., Gupta, A., Nigam, V. K., & Poluri, K. M. (2019) · Gold Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s13404-019-00264-y · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, R., Song, Y., Wang, G., & Murray, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-05
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2752-2757
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2068101890
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Core Size Matter in the Kinetics of Ligand Exchanges of Monolayer-Protected Au Clusters? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja044638c
- The paper
- Guo, R., Song, Y., Wang, G., & Murray, R. W. (2005). Does Core Size Matter in the Kinetics of Ligand Exchanges of Monolayer-Protected Au Clusters? Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja044638c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.