The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanocrystalline Iron Oxide Aerogels as Mesoporous Magnetic Architectures
Abstract
We have developed crystalline nanoarchitectures of iron oxide that exhibit superparamagnetic behavior while still retaining the desirable bicontinuous pore-solid networks and monolithic nature of an aerogel. Iron oxide aerogels are initially produced in an X-ray-amorphous, high-surface-area form, by adapting recently established sol-gel methods using Fe(III) salts and epoxide-based proton scavengers. Controlled temperature/atmosphere treatments convert the as-prepared iron oxide aerogels into nanocrystalline forms with the inverse spinel structure. As a function of the bathing gas, treatment temperature, and treatment history, these nanocrystalline forms can be reversibly tuned to predominantly exhibit either Fe(3)O(4) (magnetite) or gamma-Fe(2)O(3) (maghemite) phases, as verified by electron microscopy, X-ray and electron diffraction, microprobe Raman spectroscopy, and magnetic analysis. Peak deconvolution of the Raman-active Fe-O bands yields valuable information on the local structure and vacancy content of the various aerogel forms, and facilitates the differentiation of Fe(3)O(4) and gamma-Fe(2)O(3) components, which are difficult to assign using only diffraction methods. These nanocrystalline, magnetic forms retain the inherent characteristics of aerogels, including high surface area (>140 m(2) g(-1)), through-connected porosity concentrated in the mesopore size range (2-50 nm), and nanoscale particle sizes (7-18 nm). On the basis of this synthetic and processing protocol, we produce multifunctional nanostructured materials with effective control of the pore-solid architecture, the nanocrystalline phase, and subsequent magnetic properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemistry of Aerogels and Their Applications
Pierre, A. C., & Pajonk, G. M. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0101306 · Cited by 2,239
Catalytic nanoarchitectures—The importance of nothing and the unimportance of periodicity
Rolison, D. R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082332 · Cited by 1,037
Self-citationElectrically conductive oxide aerogels: new materials in electrochemistry
Rolison, D. R., & Dunn, B. (2001) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b007591o · Cited by 357
Self-citationXXX. The structure of the spinel group of crystals
Bragg, W. H. (1915) · The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440808635400 · Cited by 272
Leventis, N., Elder, I. A., Rolison, D. R., Anderson, M. L., & Merzbacher, C. I. (1999) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm9901966 · Cited by 163
Self-citationWallace, J. M., Rice, J. K., Pietron, J. J., Stroud, R. M., Long, J. W., & Rolison, D. R. (2003) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl034646b · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Cited by
Cao, S.-W., & Zhu, Y.-J. (2010) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1007/s11671-010-9742-7 · Cited by 2,357
Monolithic aerogel photocatalysts: a review
Wan, W., Zhang, R., Ma, M., & Zhou, Y. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta09227j · Cited by 205
Synthesis of aerogels: from molecular routes to 3-dimensional nanoparticle assembly
Rechberger, F., & Niederberger, M. (2017) · Nanoscale Horizons · doi:10.1039/c6nh00077k · Cited by 148
Zhan, S., Chen, D., Jiao, X., & Liu, S. (2007) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.026 · Cited by 108
Bali, S., Turpin, G. C., Ernst, R. D., Pugmire, R. J., Singh, V., Seehra, M. S., & Eyring, E. M. (2008) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef700691z · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, J. W., Logan, M. S., Rhodes, C. P., Carpenter, E. E., Stroud, R. M., & Rolison, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 16879-16889
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2027066878
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.