Cited by 163Luminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsAerogels and thermal insulationAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors

Durable Modification of Silica Aerogel Monoliths with Fluorescent 2,7-Diazapyrenium Moieties. Sensing Oxygen near the Speed of Open-Air Diffusion

Leventis, Nicholas, Elder, Ian A., Rolison, Debra R., Anderson, Michele L., Merzbacher, Celia I.·1999·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Silica sol−gels were covalently modified with N -(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)-2,7-diazapyrenium bromide (DAP). Luminescent aerogels are created in which none of the fluorophore leaches from the gels during either the washing or supercritical drying necessary to prepare DAP-modified aerogels. The bulk density (0.17 g/cm 3 ), N 2 -adsorption surface area (870 m 2 /g), and thermogravimetric and scanning electron micrographic characteristics of the dye-modified aerogels remain identical to those of the unmodified silica aerogels. The bulk concentration of the dye in the aerogels was ≤6.6 mM; at these loadings the aerogels demonstrate bulk photoluminescence. As based on the mesoporous surface area, the surface coverage of the dye is 7−8% of a monolayer. The absorption, emission, and O 2 -quenching characteristics of the diazapyrenium dye in the aerogels parallel those obtained in alcoholic (rather than aqueous) solution, which further indicates that the dopant molecules are isolated from each other and that they see an environment with a ∼OH polarity. Time-resolved emission studies indicate that all DAP moieties reside in a single type of microenvironment. Emission quenching of ∼1-cm-diameter monoliths of DAP−silica aerogel is complete in <15 s, which compares very favorably with the best response times for pyrene guests in micrometer-thick xerogel films. The apparent diffusion coefficient of O 2 or Ar in the DAP−aerogel monoliths was estimated at ≥0.01−0.02 cm 2 /s, which is only 10…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm9901966

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leventis, N., Elder, I. A., Rolison, D. R., Anderson, M. L., & Merzbacher, C. I.
Affiliations
United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Rolison, Debra R.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
1999-09-30
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
2837-2845
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2005650638
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Keywords
silica aerogel, oxygen sensing, oxygen quenching, photoluminescence, covalent modification, supercritical drying, dye leaching, diffusion coefficient, time-resolved emission, mesoporous materials, luminescent sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review