The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Are Ionic Liquids Liquid? A Simple Explanation Based on Lattice and Solvation Energies
Open accessAbstract
We have developed a simple and quantitative explanation for the relatively low melting temperatures of ionic liquids (ILs). The basic concept was to assess the Gibbs free energy of fusion (Delta(fus)G) for the process IL(s) --> IL(l), which relates to the melting point of the IL. This was done using a suitable Born-Fajans-Haber cycle that was closed by the lattice (i.e., IL(s) --> IL(g)) Gibbs energy and the solvation (i.e., IL(g) --> IL(l)) Gibbs energies of the constituent ions in the molten salt. As part of this project we synthesized and determined accurate melting points (by DSC) and dielectric constants (by dielectric spectroscopy) for 14 ionic liquids based on four common anions and nine common cations. Lattice free energies (Delta(latt)G) were estimated using a combination of Volume Based Thermodynamics (VBT) and quantum chemical calculations. Free energies of solvation (Delta(solv)G) of each ion in the bulk molten salt were calculated using the COSMO solvation model and the experimental dielectric constants. Under standard ambient conditions (298.15 K and 10(5) Pa) Delta(fus)G degrees was found to be negative for all the ILs studied, as expected for liquid samples. Thus, these ILs are liquid under standard ambient conditions because the liquid state is thermodynamically favorable, due to the large size and conformational flexibility of the ions involved, which leads to small lattice enthalpies and large entropy changes that favor melting. This model can be used to predict the melting temperatures and dielectric constants of ILs with good accuracy. A comparison of the predicted vs experimental melting points for nine of the ILs (excluding those where no melting transition was observed and two outliers that were not well described by the model) gave a standard error of the estimate (s(est)) of 8 degrees C. A similar comparison for dielectric constant predictions gave s(est) as 2.5 units. Thus, from very little experimental and computational data it is possible to predict fundamental properties such as melting points and dielectric constants of ionic liquids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influence of chloride, water, and organic solvents on the physical properties of ionic liquids
Seddon, K. R., Stark, A., & Torres, M.-J. (2000) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac200072122275 · Cited by 2,293
Cited by
Ionic liquids in analytical chemistry
Sun, P., & Armstrong, D. W. (2010) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2009.12.007 · Cited by 727
Karpagam, R., Jawaharraj, K., & Gnanam, R. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144236 · Cited by 146
Modelling cellulose solubilities in ionic liquids using COSMO-RS
Kahlen, J., Masuch, K., & Leonhard, K. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c0gc00200c · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Krossing, I., Slattery, J. M., Daguenet, C., Dyson, P. J., Oleinikova, A., & Weingärtner, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-09-22
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 13427-13434
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2033279894
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Are Ionic Liquids Liquid? A Simple Explanation Based on Lattice and Solvation Energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0619612
- The paper
- Krossing, I., Slattery, J. M., Daguenet, C., Dyson, P. J., Oleinikova, A., & Weingärtner, H. (2006). Why Are Ionic Liquids Liquid? A Simple Explanation Based on Lattice and Solvation Energies. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0619612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.