The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungus-Mediated Biotransformation of Amorphous Silica in Rice Husk to Nanocrystalline Silica
Abstract
Rice husk is a cheap agro-based waste material, which harbors a substantial amount of silica in the form of amorphous hydrated silica grains. However, there have been no attempts at harnessing the enormous amount of amorphous silica present in rice husk and its room-temperature biotransformation into crystalline silica nanoparticles. In this study, we address this issue and describe how naturally deposited amorphous biosilica in rice husk can be bioleached and simultaneously biotransformed into high value crystalline silica nanoparticles. We show here that the fungus Fusarium oxysporum rapidly biotransforms the naturally occurring amorphous plant biosilica into crystalline silica and leach out silica extracellularly at room temperature in the form of 2-6 nm quasi-spherical, highly crystalline silica nanoparticles capped by stabilizing proteins; that the nanoparticles are released into solution is an advantage of this process with significant application and commercial potential. Calcination of the silica nanoparticles leads to loss of occluded protein and to an apparently porous structure often of cubic morphology. The room-temperature synthesis of oxide nanomaterials using microorganisms starting from potential cheap agro-industrial waste materials is an exciting possibility and could lead to an energy-conserving and economically viable green approach toward the large-scale synthesis of oxide nanomaterials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lowenstam, H. A. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7008198 · Cited by 1,363
Cited by
Potential scenarios for nanomaterial release and subsequent alteration in the environment
Nowack, B., Ranville, J. F., Diamond, S., Gallego-Urrea, J. A., Metcalfe, C., Rose, J., Horne, N., Koelmans, A. A., & Klaine, S. J. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.726 · Cited by 598
Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review
Jones, M., Mautner, A., Luenco, S., Bismarck, A., & John, S. (2020) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108397 · Cited by 591
Rice husk silica derived nanomaterials for sustainable applications
Shen, Y. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.115 · Cited by 304
Porous silica and carbon derived materials from rice husk pyrolysis char
Shen, Y., Zhao, P., & Shao, Q. (2014) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.01.005 · Cited by 281
Ehrlich, H., Demadis, K. D., Pokrovsky, O. S., & Koutsoukos, P. G. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900334y · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, V., Ahmad, A., & Sastry, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-11
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 14059-14066
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1968553413
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.