Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time-Resolved in Situ Studies of Oxygen Intercalation into SrCoO2.5, Performed by Neutron Diffraction and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Le Toquin, Ronan, Paulus, Werner, Cousson, Alain, Prestipino, Carmelo, Lamberti, Carlo·2006·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Electrochemical oxidation of the antiferromagnetically ordered SrCoO(2.5), with brownmillerite-type structure, to the cubic ferromagnet SrCoO(3), with perovskite structure, has been investigated in situ by neutron diffraction as well as by X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy in specially designed electrochemical cells. The neutron diffraction experiments were performed twice, using two different wavelengths (lambda = 1.2921(2) and 4.74 A) in order to better discriminate structural and magnetic changes as functions of the charge transfer. From the neutron diffraction experiments, two intermediate phases, SrCoO(2.75) and SrCoO(2.82)(+/-)(0.07), were characterized. No superstructure reflections were observed for the corresponding SrCoO(2.75) phase. Instead we observed here, for the first time, 3D oxygen ordering during an oxygen intercalation reaction, as established for SrCoO(2.82)(+/-)(0.07), which can be described as a tetragonal unit cell, related to the perovskite cell by a approximately 2(a radical2) and c approximately 2a. The structure of this intermediate phase confirms the strongly topotactic character of the oxygen intercalation reaction. We were also able to prove, from in situ XAFS spectroscopy at the Co absorption edge, that the evolution of the Co valence state from formally +3 for SrCoO(2.5) to +4 for the final reaction product (SrCoO(3.0)) does not proceed continuously but gives evidence for the formation of O(-) species for stoichiometries corresponding to SrCoO(2.82)(+/-)(0.07). The use of neutrons (vs X-rays) in the diffraction experiments and the choice of the transmission (vs fluorescence) mode in the XAFS experiment guarantee that the obtained data well represent bulk and not just surface properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja063207m

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Le Toquin, R., Paulus, W., Cousson, A., Prestipino, C., & Lamberti, C.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2006-09-20
Volume
128
Issue
40
Pages
13161-13174
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2041670291
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time-Resolved in Situ Studies of Oxygen Intercalation into SrCoO2.5, Performed by Neutron Diffraction and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja063207m
The paper
Le Toquin, R., Paulus, W., Cousson, A., Prestipino, C., & Lamberti, C. (2006). Time-Resolved in Situ Studies of Oxygen Intercalation into SrCoO2.5, Performed by Neutron Diffraction and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja063207m

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.