The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Single Wall Carbon Nanotube Amplification: En Route to a Type-Specific Growth Mechanism
Abstract
With the desire to mass produce any specific n,m type of single wall carbon nanotube (SWNT) from a small sample of the same material, we disclose here the preliminary work directed toward that goal. The ultimate protocol would involve taking a single n,m-type nanotube sample, cutting the nanotubes in that sample into many short nanotubes, using each of those short nanotubes as a template for growing much longer nanotubes of the same type, and then repeating the process. The result would be an amplification of the original tube type: a parent SWNT serving as the prolific progenitor of future identical SWNT types. As a proof-of-concept, we use here a short SWNT seed as a template for vapor liquid solid (VLS) amplification growth of an individual long SWNT. The original short SWNT seed was a polymer-wrapped SWNT, end-carboxylated, and further tethered with Fe salts at its ends. The Fe salts were to act as the growth catalysts upon subsequent reductive activation. Deposition of the short SWNT-Fe tipped species upon an oxide surface was followed by heating in air to consume the polymer wrappers, then reducing the Fe salts to Fe(0) under a H2-rich atmosphere. During this heating, the Fe(0) can etch back into the short SWNT so that the short SWNT acts as a template for new growth to a long SWNT that occurs upon introduction of C2H4 as a carbon source. Analysis indicated that the templated VLS-grown long SWNT had the same diameter and surface orientation as the original short SWNT seed, although amplifying the original n,m type remains to be proven. This study could pave the way for an amplified growth process of SWNTs en route to any n,m tube type synthesis from a starting sample of pure nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, A., & Lieber, C. M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00608 · Cited by 621
Rao, R., Pint, C. L., Islam, A. E., Weatherup, R. S., Hofmann, S., Meshot, E. R., Wu, F., Zhou, C., Dee, N., Amama, P. B., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b06511 · Cited by 588
Self-citationOmachi, H., Segawa, Y., & Itami, K. (2012) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300055x · Cited by 428
Magical Allotropes of Carbon: Prospects and Applications
Tiwari, S. K., Kumar, V., Huczko, A., Oraon, R., Adhikari, A. D., & Nayak, G. C. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408436.2015.1127206 · Cited by 320
Suresh, S. M., Duda, E., Hall, D., Yao, Z., Bagnich, S., Slawin, A. M. Z., Bässler, H., Beljonne, D., Buck, M., Olivier, Y., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13704 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Smalley, R. E., Li, Y., Moore, V. C., Price, B. K., Colorado, R., Schmidt, H. K., Hauge, R. H., Barron, A. R., & Tour, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-11-15
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 15824-15829
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2033749202
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single Wall Carbon Nanotube Amplification: En Route to a Type-Specific Growth Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja065767r
- The paper
- Smalley, R. E., Li, Y., Moore, V. C., Price, B. K., Colorado, R., Schmidt, H. K., Hauge, R. H., Barron, A. R., & Tour, J. M. (2006). Single Wall Carbon Nanotube Amplification: En Route to a Type-Specific Growth Mechanism. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja065767r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.