The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interplay among Folding, Sequence, and Lipophilicity in the Antibacterial and Hemolytic Activities of α/β-Peptides
Abstract
Host-defense peptides inhibit bacterial growth but manifest relatively little toxicity toward eukaryotic cells. Many host-defense peptides adopt alpha-helical conformations in which cationic side chains and lipophilic side chains are segregated to distinct regions of the molecular surface ("globally amphiphilic helices"). Several efforts have been made to develop unnatural oligomers that mimic the selective antibacterial activity of host-defense peptides; these efforts have focused on the creation of molecules that are globally amphiphilic in the preferred conformation. One such endeavor, from our laboratories, focused on helix-forming alpha/beta-peptides, i.e., oligomers containing a 1:1 pattern of alpha- and beta-amino acid residues in the backbone [Schmitt, M. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6848-6849]. We found, unexpectedly, that the most favorable biological activity profile was displayed by a "scrambled" sequence, which was designed not to be able to form a globally amphiphilic helix. Here we report new data, involving an expanded set of alpha/beta-peptides, from experiments designed to elucidate the origins of this surprising result. In addition, we evaluate the susceptibility of alpha/beta-peptides to proteolytic degradation. Our results support the hypothesis that the ability to adopt a globally amphiphilic helical conformation is not a prerequisite for selective antibacterial activity. This conclusion represents a significant advance in our understanding of the relationship among molecular composition, conformation, and biological activity. Our results should therefore influence the design of other unnatural oligomers intended to function as antibacterial agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Cited by
Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity
Muñoz-Bonilla, A., & Fernández-García, M. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.005 · Cited by 1,221
Vasudev, P. G., Chatterjee, S., Shamala, N., & Balaram, P. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100100x · Cited by 329
Zhang, D., Chen, Q., Shi, C., Chen, M., Ma, K., Wan, J., & Liu, R. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202007226 · Cited by 303
The Antimicrobial Peptides P-113Du and P-113Tri Function against Candida albicans
Lin, G.-Y., Chen, H.-F., Xue, Y.-P., Yeh, Y.-C., Chen, C.-L., Liu, M.-S., Cheng, W.-C., & Lan, C.-Y. (2016) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00699-16 · Cited by 14
Spontaneous transmembrane pore formation by short-chain synthetic peptide
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2021.08.033 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, M. A., Weisblum, B., & Gellman, S. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-09
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 417-428
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2005929034
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.