The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lone Pair−π and π−π Interactions Play an Important Role in Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions
Open accessAbstract
Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET), a class of formal hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions, is of widespread interest because it is implicated in a broad range of chemical and biochemical processes. PCET is typically differentiated from HAT by the fact that it occurs when a proton and electron are transferred between different sets of molecular orbitals. Previous theoretical work predicted that hydrogen bonding between reactants is a necessary but not sufficient condition for H exchanges to take place by PCET. This implies that HAT is the only mechanism for H exchange between two carbon atoms. In this work, we present computational results that show that the H exchange in the tert-butylperoxyl/phenol couple, a prototypical antioxidant exchange reaction, occurs by PCET and that the transfer of the electron can occur via an oxygen lone pair-ring pi overlap. We then show that the H exchange in a model for the tyrosyl/tyrosine couple, which is implicated in ribonucleotide reductase chemistry, occurs via PCET and that one path for the electron transfer is provided by a strong pi-stacking interaction. Finally, we show that a pi-stacking interaction in the benzyl/toluene couple, a system in which there is no H-bonding, can result in this exchange occurring via PCET to some extent. Collectively, these results indicate that PCET reactions are not unique to systems that can engage in H-bonding and that lone pair-pi and pi-pi interactions in these systems may be more important than previously understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stubbe, J., Nocera, D. G., Yee, C. S., & Chang, M. C. Y. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020421u · Cited by 823
Cited by
Ingold, K. U., & Pratt, D. A. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500226n · Cited by 531
Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Moving Together and Charging Forward
Hammes-Schiffer, S. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04087 · Cited by 468
Free Radical Scavenging by Natural Polyphenols: Atom versus Electron Transfer
Di Meo, F., Lemaur, V., Cornil, J., Lazzaroni, R., Duroux, J.-L., Olivier, Y., & Trouillas, P. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp3116319 · Cited by 294
Is Vitamin A an Antioxidant or a Pro-oxidant?
Dao, D. Q., Ngo, T. C., Thong, N. M., & Nam, P. C. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b07065 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- DiLabio, G. A., & Johnson, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-04-20
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 6199-6203
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1980770514
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.