The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell-Penetrating Quantum Dots Based on Multivalent and Endosome-Disrupting Surface Coatings
Abstract
We report the development of cell-penetrating quantum dots (QDs) based on the use of multivalent and endosome-disrupting (endosomolytic) surface coatings. Hyperbranched copolymer ligands such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) grafted polyethylenimine (PEI-g-PEG) are found to encapsulate and solubilize luminescent quantum dots through direct ligand-exchange reactions. Because of the positive charges and a "proton sponge effect" associated with multivalent amine groups, this class of ligand-exchanged QDs is able to penetrate cell membranes and is also able to disrupt endosomal organelles in living cells. The grafted PEG segment is essential for reducing the cytotoxicity of PEI as well as for improving the overall nanoparticle stability and biocompatibility. In comparison with previous QDs encapsulated with amphiphilic polymers, the cell-penetrating QDs are smaller in size and are considerably more stable in acidic environments. Cellular uptake and imaging studies reveal that the number of PEG grafts per PEI molecule has a pronounced effect on the intracellular pathways of internalized QDs. In particular, QDs coated with PEI-g-PEG2 are rapidly internalized by endocytosis, and are initially stored in vesicles, followed by slow endosomal escape and release into the cytoplasm. These insights are important toward the design and development of nanoparticle agents for intracellular imaging and therapeutic applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PATRI, A., KUKOWSKALATALLO, J., & BAKERJR, J. (2005) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.09.014 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Cellular uptake of nanoparticles: Journey inside the cell
Behzadi, S., Serpooshan, V., Tao, W., Hamaly, M. A., Alkawareek, M. Y., Dreaden, E. C., Brown, D., Alkilany, A. M., Farokhzad, O. C., & Mahmoudi, M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00636a · Cited by 2,859
Engineered Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy
Sun, T., Zhang, Y. S., Pang, B., Hyun, D. C., Yang, M., & Xia, Y. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201403036 · Cited by 2,164
Xia, T., Kovochich, M., Liong, M., Meng, H., Kabehie, S., George, S., Zink, J. I., & Nel, A. E. (2009) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn900918w · Cited by 933
Chemical Synthesis and Assembly of Uniformly Sized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Medical Applications
Ling, D., Lee, N., & Hyeon, T. (2015) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00038 · Cited by 513
Meta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots
Oh, E., Liu, R., Nel, A., Gemill, K. B., Bilal, M., Cohen, Y., & Medintz, I. L. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.338 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, H., & Nie, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-24
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3333-3338
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1972605174
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.